Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:02:28
Server time: 20:57:31, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Smoker's Freedom Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Sojuz Ljudej (People's Union)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2123

Description[?]:

Trying once again to change the laws on smoking

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:06:08, October 08, 2005 CET
From Liberty Party
ToDebating the Smoker's Freedom Act
MessageAgreed

Date03:20:19, October 08, 2005 CET
From Partiya Natsional'noy Gordyy
ToDebating the Smoker's Freedom Act
MessageAgainst.

Date05:19:08, October 09, 2005 CET
From People's Equality Party Of Trigunia
ToDebating the Smoker's Freedom Act
MessageI guess you're only liberal when it's convienient to you, huh SLP?

Date09:36:39, October 09, 2005 CET
From Partiya Natsional'noy Gordyy
ToDebating the Smoker's Freedom Act
MessageWhat doy mean exactly ? May be PEPOT is a bit worried about the possible outcome. We invite you to look at out voting record. You'll see our voting behaviour is accordingly. The SLP is a liberal and a social party. May be this causes some confusion. On this smoking business for instance we will vote no because it dangers directly the health of others in public places and the impact on one's personal freedom is greatly. Because of smoking in the post office customers might leave. We can't have that can we. Besides that the smokers are a minority so.....
The SLP has voted against this proposal before and before that and we will do so in future. Very consistent would't you say ?

Date14:39:25, October 09, 2005 CET
From Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Smoker's Freedom Act
MessageNon smokers have the right not to be affected and damaged by smokers

Date02:55:04, October 10, 2005 CET
From People's Equality Party Of Trigunia
ToDebating the Smoker's Freedom Act
MessageThat's not very liberal thinking. If you we're a liberal, and social, you would recognize that smokers' have rights too, and should be able to do anything they want with their bodies anywhere they want. Non smokers have the right not be affected yes, and they can express that right by not being near a person who smokes. If individual establisment owners want to ban smoking in their place of business, thats fine, but it should not be the goverment's job to do so.

Date05:06:54, October 10, 2005 CET
From Partiya Natsional'noy Gordyy
ToDebating the Smoker's Freedom Act
MessageSmokers do have rights. However, in public places they are limited. The rights of the non smokers are more important. Smokers of course can smoke outside the public building of course. In our view this is a task of the government to enforce beause it is related to public offices.

Date05:35:16, October 10, 2005 CET
From Liberty Party
ToDebating the Smoker's Freedom Act
MessageSmoking outside the public building means you are in a public location which is currently banned.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 255

no
    

Total Seats: 300

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to prevent confusion by ensuring unofficial or outdated bills labelled as "Cultural Protocols" are removed from their nation page.

    Random quote: "Without opposition there is no politics." - Alun Daffys, former Alorian politician

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 64