Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 02:02:24
Server time: 01:57:35, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Caoimhean | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Economic Reform Bill of 2122

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Calvinist Unionist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2123

Description[?]:

Reforms intended to strengthen the economy.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:46:17, October 08, 2005 CET
FromRedneck Party
ToDebating the Economic Reform Bill of 2122
MessageSure

Date04:08:04, October 08, 2005 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the Economic Reform Bill of 2122
MessageI could vote for articles one and two, but the others seem to help the economy to the detriment of the environment or the safety of Luthori citizens.

Date04:13:01, October 08, 2005 CET
FromSocial Calvinist Unionist Party
ToDebating the Economic Reform Bill of 2122
MessageIt's called a Free Market, CHEAT. We're not a communist state, and we shouldn't run our citizens lives. Sure, in some areas we should, but they can choose for themselves how to make their own economic decisions. Long live economic freedom!

Date15:22:59, October 08, 2005 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the Economic Reform Bill of 2122
MessageI don't want a communist state, I also don't want to run our citizens lives. But article six is the only one that actually deals with the government running people's lives. I also have nothing against economic freedom, unless it is to the detriment of the environment, the Commonwealth, or its citizens.

Date17:30:10, October 08, 2005 CET
FromSocial Calvinist Unionist Party
ToDebating the Economic Reform Bill of 2122
MessageIf its good for the economy, it's good for the Commonwealth. So what if we slacken the environmental protection just a tad bit? So what if we allow our citizens to protect themselves? Will that bring the commonwealth crashing to the ground? I think not.

Date22:50:18, October 08, 2005 CET
FromSeosavists Republican party
ToDebating the Economic Reform Bill of 2122
Messageartical 1: This is not good for Luthori, Drug companies will move to other nations that do subsidise them.
artical 2: In case of power generation going down in one region productivity goes down to 0 percent there instead of everywhere taking a small hit. I don't see how this is good economicly.
Article 3: Fireworks are dangerous and people can be stupid.
Artical 4: Some people believe that GM food is bad for them they should know if their food is GM or not.
Artical 5: Allowing guns makes it easier for criminals to get them.
Artical 6: Some people don't think about their future.
7 & 8: ok.

Date01:03:45, October 09, 2005 CET
FromSocial Calvinist Unionist Party
ToDebating the Economic Reform Bill of 2122
MessageArticle 1: It appears I made a wee bit of a mistake on that one. I meant for no subsidization and no regulation, but that can be changed later.
Article 2: But having one region go down to 0 percent is better than all regions go down to 10%, no?
Artilce 3: Everything is dangerous.
Article 4: But GM's AREN'T bad for them! We shouldn't give in to environmentalist propaganda!
Article 5: I don't think "strict regulations" means that criminals can get guns. There are extensive background checks involved, and if a person is accused of dealings with criminals they will be bared from getting the guns. And remember, nearly all criminals use illegal weapons.
Article 6: Then too bad for them.

Date02:32:31, October 09, 2005 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the Economic Reform Bill of 2122
MessageHey, what's with the environmentalist bashing. I'm an environmentalist and I support GM crops.

Date02:32:32, October 09, 2005 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the Economic Reform Bill of 2122
MessageHey, what's with the environmentalist bashing. I'm an environmentalist and I support GM crops.

Date05:01:24, October 09, 2005 CET
FromSocial Calvinist Unionist Party
ToDebating the Economic Reform Bill of 2122
MessageThe majority of Environmentalists do not. I'm against anyone who sacrifices a nation for nature, and while you only do it to a small extent, the majority of environmentalists would rather we live in tree's than in cities =P

Date23:16:54, October 09, 2005 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Economic Reform Bill of 2122
MessageI can't believe you managed to sneak this rubbish through. No labelling of GM produce and a populace that is better armed than the police?!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 219

no
  

Total Seats: 216

abstain
    

Total Seats: 315


Random fact: The grey space in the east is populated by the forum-based countries, known in-game as the former colonies or the "Third World". These countries are managed by the Third World Coordinator but players can request control of individual countries in the Third World Control Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=8302

Random quote: "Fascism is capitalism plus murder." - Upton Sinclair

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 107