We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet discussion
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union of Democratic Socialists
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2683
Description[?]:
| We at the UDS realise we've created some animosity with regards to the cabinet of United Jakania, but the lopsided cabinet we proposed was due to frustration at the lack of prior discussion when parties were proposing cabinets. We ask the other parties of this great nation to forgive this foolish action and embrace a cabinet including all parties represented in the legislature. Oh, and feel free to list what your preferred positions would be in such a cabinet. Or alternatively tell us to shove it. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:10:49, December 15, 2008 CET | From | Union of Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Cabinet discussion |
| Message | Personally we'd be looking for internal affairs/finance and health and social services, perhaps with environment and tourism thrown in. |
| Date | 20:42:11, December 15, 2008 CET | From | Birleşik Demokrat Parti | To | Debating the Cabinet discussion |
| Message | Finance would be good, along with either trade and industry or education |
| Date | 03:21:46, December 16, 2008 CET | From | Party for a Federal Meritocracy | To | Debating the Cabinet discussion |
| Message | The ones we care about, in order of importance, are: Justice Education and Culture Science and Technology Infrastructure and Transport Defense The SLP, of course, very strongly desires the Science and Technology spot. We will oppose any lineup that gives us Foreign Affairs. Oh, and I wouldn't call the previous problems animosity. Although forceful it was intended as a reminder that all should be considered as the tides do shift. We certainly never expected the current cabinet to last this long and are surprised that it has. |
| Date | 11:04:55, December 16, 2008 CET | From | Scientific Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Cabinet discussion |
| Message | PFM is correct: as long as we have Science and Technology, we're basically all set. We would rather not wind up with too many fewer positions than we currently have, but we are willing to give up a couple for the sake of a more fair and equitable Cabinet. We also do like to uphold the tradition of giving the Chancellor spot to either the largest party, or the largest party that doesn't already have the Supreme Governor. |
| Date | 19:48:14, December 16, 2008 CET | From | Union of Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Cabinet discussion |
| Message | With the apparent absence of the CRO, this is the first draft I've come up with. Chancellor: SLP Foreign Affairs: UDS (because no-one else seems to want it!) Internal Affairs: UDS Finance: JNP Defence: UDS (open to discussion) Justice: PFM Infrastructure and Transport: SLP (can be changed) Health and Social Services: UDS Education and Culture: PFM Science and Technology: SLP Food and Agriculture: UDS Environment and Tourism: JNP Trade and Industry: JNP |
| Date | 09:50:47, December 17, 2008 CET | From | Scientific Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Cabinet discussion |
| Message | That proposal is acceptable to us. |
| Date | 00:28:23, December 18, 2008 CET | From | Civil Party | To | Debating the Cabinet discussion |
| Message | I would like forign affairs. Please put me in!!!!! |
| Date | 21:19:10, December 18, 2008 CET | From | Union of Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Cabinet discussion |
| Message | Getting it off the floor, but keeping it on record. Vote however you want. |
| Date | 22:02:18, December 18, 2008 CET | From | Civil Party | To | Debating the Cabinet discussion |
| Message | I am not absent! On break. |
| Date | 22:08:43, December 18, 2008 CET | From | Civil Party | To | Debating the Cabinet discussion |
| Message | Foreign Affairs Defence Infrastructure and Transport We will like those postions to have in the Cabinent. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 74 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 25 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
| Random quote: "Hence it comes about that all armed Prophets have been victorious, and all unarmed Prophets have been destroyed." - Niccolo Machiavelli |