We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Rose Multi-Subject Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rose Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2685
Description[?]:
For Visibility Purposes |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The banking system.
Old value:: The government operates a central bank and all other banks are private.
Current: The government operates a central bank and all other banks are private.
Proposed: All banks are privately owned.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation can only use chemical or biological weapons on non-civilan areas.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the use of land mines by the army.
Old value:: The Government leaves this to the army to decide upon.
Current: The use of land mines is allowed.
Proposed: The use of land mines is allowed.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The total number of seats in the legislative assembly. Should be between 75 and 750.
Old value:: 666
Current: 213
Proposed: 500
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 02:02:21, December 23, 2008 CET | From | Rose Party | To | Debating the Rose Multi-Subject Bill |
Message | We must rectify this unorthodox number of seats to better appease our fellow religous members of the Rose. |
Date | 10:52:18, December 23, 2008 CET | From | Neo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika | To | Debating the Rose Multi-Subject Bill |
Message | The NKRP seem to have missed a lot whilst we have been away, who are the Rose? |
Date | 10:54:52, December 23, 2008 CET | From | Free thinking Party | To | Debating the Rose Multi-Subject Bill |
Message | no what is wrong with more seats? it provides a better ample of opinion! All other articles I also disagree with, we need one central bank just in case of a recession or other economic crisis |
Date | 18:53:59, December 23, 2008 CET | From | Likaton Coalition of the Willing | To | Debating the Rose Multi-Subject Bill |
Message | Why shoulod we appease members of an unrepresented lunatic religious fringe; their main manifesto appears to be misogyny and violence... |
Date | 23:59:56, December 23, 2008 CET | From | Rose Party | To | Debating the Rose Multi-Subject Bill |
Message | I have nothing against more seats....however, this unorthodox number is frankly disturbing. (To NKRP): We're new. I'm a frequent Particracy player. Came here for a new atmosphere and just made up a bunch of stuff about how the Coalition of the Rose and all other "Rose-related" occurances happened." it's RP, my friend. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 0 | |||
no | Total Seats: 362 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 59 |
Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: "Capitalism and communism stand at opposite poles. Their essential difference is this: the communist, seeing the rich man and his fine home, says: 'No man should have so much.' The capitalist, seeing the same thing, says: 'All men should have as much.'" - Phelps Adams |