We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Woman in the Army
Details
Submitted by[?]: Zapatista Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2124
Description[?]:
| This is not creating a more equal society. We hope to see this change for female equality! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Women in the military.
Old value:: Women can only serve in non-battle positions.
Current: Women serve alongside men.
Proposed: Women serve alongside men.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:34:55, October 08, 2005 CET | From |  Labour Party | To | Debating the Woman in the Army |
| Message | Lbour agrees, Mr. Speaker |
| Date | 20:01:54, October 09, 2005 CET | From | Tokundski Nacionalisti | To | Debating the Woman in the Army |
| Message | bollocks you frigging inbred darkies, go back to shagging your sister, leave fighting to men, and real men at that, bunch of frigging degenerate student quanzari loving monkeys. |
| Date | 13:42:33, October 11, 2005 CET | From | Tokundski Nacionalisti | To | Debating the Woman in the Army |
| Message | Our nations security has nothing to do with equality. Furthering equality into the army, simply for the sake of equality, will not benefit this nation in any way whatsoever, stop pushing equality just for the sake of equality. |
| Date | 17:56:21, October 11, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Cobura | To | Debating the Woman in the Army |
| Message | The 'degenerate' nonsense comes, as ever, from the local fascist party. The Social Democrats support this. |
| Date | 20:15:42, October 11, 2005 CET | From | Zapatista Party | To | Debating the Woman in the Army |
| Message | Then let the votes begin! |
| Date | 10:56:39, October 12, 2005 CET | From | Tokundski Nacionalisti | To | Debating the Woman in the Army |
| Message | what is the point? No-one had stated a single argument other than equality as the reason for allowing women to serve in the front line. Will this benefit our army? No of course not. Please try and argue your case, otherwise there is no point in doing this. |
| Date | 22:08:00, October 12, 2005 CET | From | Zapatista Party | To | Debating the Woman in the Army |
| Message | The arguement is equality. Isnt that enough? Unlike your time warped party that still seems to be stuck in the early fascist days, we beleive that woman arnt their purely to raise children and look after the male! They should at LEAST be given the choice! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 75 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 51 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 124 |
| Random fact: When forming a cabinet, try to include as few parties as possible, while still obtaining a majority of the seats. |
| Random quote: "In a sense we have come to our nation's capital to cash a cheque. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." - Martin Luther King Jr. |