Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 03:16:17
Server time: 12:43:42, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): echizen | HawkDun | Mbites2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: H+ Seats Change

Details

Submitted by[?]: H+ Paradigm

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2686

Description[?]:

99 is better.

Much better.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:02:54, December 25, 2008 CET
FromH+ Paradigm
ToDebating the H+ Seats Change
MessageWhy against UFL? Faster/easier to calculate 2/3rds of 99 than of 561.

Date09:57:45, December 26, 2008 CET
FromH+ Paradigm
ToDebating the H+ Seats Change
Message:(

Date12:56:12, December 26, 2008 CET
FromUnited Føderale League (NUC-DMF)
ToDebating the H+ Seats Change
MessageBecause there were reasons for 561, and I'm afraid the party supports large representation

Date18:36:55, December 29, 2008 CET
FromH+ Paradigm
ToDebating the H+ Seats Change
MessageWhat reasons?

Would 666 seats be good enough?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 290

no
    

Total Seats: 271

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Check out the forum regularly for game news. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "The communist revolution is the most radical rupture with traditional property relations; no wonder that its development involves the most radical rupture with traditional ideas." - Karl Marx

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 47