Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 01:06:55
Server time: 18:53:04, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Mindus | VojmatDunDSU | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Freedom of Movement Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Centrist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2043

Description[?]:

In order to fight the potential corruption and/or "big brother" potential inherent in compulsory national identification cards, it is hereby proposed that further identification cards be issued on a strictly voluntary basis.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Datenot recorded
From
ToDebating the Freedom of Movement Act
MessageThe bill with ID cards has only just passed, is there a need to revisit it so soon? Also is there any real purpose to voluntary ID cards?

Datenot recorded
FromLiberal Party for Equality
ToDebating the Freedom of Movement Act
Messagea national id card serves many administrational purposes, and is no infringement of rights as long as nobody is forced to carry them I think that the current legislation is better

Datenot recorded
From
ToDebating the Freedom of Movement Act
MessageI think it's fine as it is too.

Datenot recorded
FromNational Centrist Party
ToDebating the Freedom of Movement Act
MessageI don't like the government having access to any more information than I give them. I just don't think that strong central governments are very trustworthy.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 155

no
 

Total Seats: 12

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation.

    Random quote: "The key to understanding the American system is to imagine that you have the power to make nearly any law you want, but your worst enemy will be the one to enforce it." - Rick Cook

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 60