We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Income tax proposal of December 2689
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Liberal League
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes to change income taxes. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2690
Description[?]:
| The Left-Libertarian League propose to adjust the government's income tax policy to better address the economic situation of the Valruzian Federation. |
Proposals
Article 1
We propose to alter income tax brackets to the following setup. Information about the current income tax system can be found here.
| Bracket | Tax | Estimated Revenue |
| > 15,000 VPO | 11% | 27,652,000,000 VPO |
| > 20,000 VPO | 16% | 30,401,000,000 VPO |
| > 25,000 VPO | 20% | 27,842,000,000 VPO |
| > 30,000 VPO | 23% | 25,270,000,000 VPO |
| > 35,000 VPO | 32% | 25,608,000,000 VPO |
| > 40,000 VPO | 37% | 40,485,000,000 VPO |
| > 50,000 VPO | 40% | 30,703,000,000 VPO |
| > 60,000 VPO | 43% | 17,127,000,000 VPO |
| > 70,000 VPO | 45% | 23,606,000,000 VPO |
| > 100,000 VPO | 50% | 2,843,000,000 VPO | Total | 251,537,000,000 VPO |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:02:36, January 02, 2009 CET | From | Walruzyjska Partia Libertariańska | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of December 2689 |
| Message | this is not accpectable |
| Date | 05:06:54, January 02, 2009 CET | From | National Liberal League | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of December 2689 |
| Message | yeah what a terrible concept. People actually keeping the money they earn! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 121 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 104 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Politics, when it is an art and a service, not an exploitation, is about acting for an ideal through realities." - Charles De Gaulle |