We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the An International Agreement to Prevent the Rise of Autocracy in Terra
Details
Submitted by[?]: Aldurian Communist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2124
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the An International Agreement to Prevent the Rise of Autocracy in Terra. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the An International Agreement to Prevent the Rise of Autocracy in Terra.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:05:39, October 09, 2005 CET | From | Aldurian Libertarian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the An International Agreement to Prevent the Rise of Autocracy in Terra |
| Message | The Social Liberals will agree to this bill. However, we have some concerns: -Article 6 de facto alienates constitutional monarchies. Although we are openly anti-monarchist, we think that alienating nations that have a strong democratic tradition only because they are constitutional monarchy is not a good thing. - Article 12 outlaws moderate positions such as 'Police officers may only carry non-lethal weapons apart from specially trained firearms units' i.e. outlaw SWAT units. |
| Date | 01:26:09, October 10, 2005 CET | From |  Freedom Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the An International Agreement to Prevent the Rise of Autocracy in Terra |
| Message | OOC: The Freedom Party has asked Wouter for a way to amend. |
| Date | 07:15:51, October 10, 2005 CET | From | Aldurian Communist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the An International Agreement to Prevent the Rise of Autocracy in Terra |
| Message | We are not necessarily alienating constitutional monarchies. We are simply saying that we will not allow all executive power to be concentrated in one person. It only applies to us, and since we do not have a constitutional monarchy, it is not a problem. It does not mean that we cannot have good relations with constitutional monarchies. |
| Date | 05:33:35, October 11, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the An International Agreement to Prevent the Rise of Autocracy in Terra |
| Message | The Freedom Party thanks the ACP for its support. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 239 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 61 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "The best political weapon is the weapon of terror. Cruelty commands respect. Men may hate us, but we don't ask for their love, only for their fear." - Heinrich Himmler |