We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Social Reforms
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2694
Description[?]:
| Because we want a more autonomous military |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Military stance on homosexuality.
Old value:: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Current: Open homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military has a "don't ask, don't tell" policy.
Proposed: Open homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military has a "don't ask, don't tell" policy.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the use of land mines by the army.
Old value:: The use of land mines is allowed.
Current: The use of land mines is allowed.
Proposed: The Government leaves this to the army to decide upon.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Discrimination in the military on grounds of race/religion.
Old value:: Any adult citizen can serve in the military, discrimination for racial or religious reasons is prohibited.
Current: Any adult citizen can serve in the military, discrimination for racial or religious reasons is prohibited.
Proposed: The government does not interfere with the military over who can serve in it.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:18:51, January 03, 2009 CET | From |  Partido Objetivista Pragmático | To | Debating the Military Social Reforms |
| Message | i dont like this |
| Date | 16:48:31, January 03, 2009 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Military Social Reforms |
| Message | Of course you don't |
| Date | 16:51:37, January 03, 2009 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Military Social Reforms |
| Message | Can you what exactly you don't like about our bill? |
| Date | 17:52:53, January 03, 2009 CET | From | Partido Objetivista Pragmático | To | Debating the Military Social Reforms |
| Message | the military is an institution created to protect the empire of the constitution... they must obbey the goverment in all cases (if the gov do uphold the const. of course)... they are a not-debating institution... there is not democracy between soldiers the must obbey they superiors in all matters... if i vote for this im giving the military more power... decreasing the goverment's... and that could end up in a coup d'etat... sorry about my english is not my native language... |
| Date | 21:45:16, January 03, 2009 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Military Social Reforms |
| Message | They are only administrative reforms, no coup a la vista... |
| Date | 01:01:47, January 04, 2009 CET | From | NeoSocialist Party of The Multitude | To | Debating the Military Social Reforms |
| Message | We'll vote against it. |
| Date | 01:01:47, January 04, 2009 CET | From | NeoSocialist Party of The Multitude | To | Debating the Military Social Reforms |
| Message | We'll vote against it. |
| Date | 05:44:11, January 04, 2009 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Military Social Reforms |
| Message | We know you'll vote against us, but we're asking our coalition partners what they think. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 283 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 251 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 216 |
| Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed). |
| Random quote: "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius, and a lot of courage, to move in the opposite direction." - Albert Einstein |