We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ubi periculum
Details
Submitted by[?]: Partido Objetivista Pragmático
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2691
Description[?]:
| various religious matters |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The state's intervention in the appointment of ministers of religion.
Old value:: The state appoints all heads and other ministers of all religions.
Current: The state does not intervene in the appointment of ministers of any religion whatsoever.
Proposed: The state does not intervene in the appointment of ministers of any religion whatsoever.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The state's policy concerning religious clothing.
Old value:: People are required to dress according to religious codes
Current: Public officials are not allowed to wear religious symbols while exercising their duties.
Proposed: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The governments stance on religious schools.
Old value:: All schools are required to be religious in nature.
Current: Religious schools are not allowed.
Proposed: Any religion may set up a school, but they are strictly regulated.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Remuneration of ministers of religion.
Old value:: The remuneration of ministers of religion shall be left up to the local governments.
Current: Ministers of religion shall receive no remuneration whatsoever.
Proposed: The state does not intervene in the remuneration of ministers of religion.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to prayer in schools.
Old value:: Teacher-led prayers are mandatory in schools.
Current: Teacher-led prayers in schools are forbidden.
Proposed: The government leaves this decision up to the schools themselves.
Article 6
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning religions.
Old value:: There is an official state religion, and membership is mandatory.
Current: There is no official state religion, but the government only allows recognized religions. 'Cults' are persecuted.
Proposed: There is no government policy concerning a state religion.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:55:47, January 03, 2009 CET | From |  Capitalist Progressive Union (CPU) | To | Debating the Ubi periculum |
| Message | Mr Speaker; The CPU highly advises the NeoScoialist Party and the Satanic Republican Party to vote yes on this bill, our party is confounded as to how such a bill has not passed already. I yield the floor. |
| Date | 00:57:22, January 04, 2009 CET | From | NeoSocialist Party of The Multitude | To | Debating the Ubi periculum |
| Message | I could destroy this bill right now. And I should. The POP has destroyed all good ties with us. But if I vote yes on this, we will need to revise our ties. |
| Date | 05:40:04, January 04, 2009 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Ubi periculum |
| Message | They're randian. |
| Date | 05:50:50, January 04, 2009 CET | From | NWOIAUCFCCNUCDMFSatanilicRepublicanParty | To | Debating the Ubi periculum |
| Message | Right Hand SRP Representative Rev. Marv: We the SRP will vote no. We are strongly against articles 3, 5, and 6. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 468 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 282 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: If you want to leave Particracy, please inactivate yourself on your user page to save the moderation team some time. |
| Random quote: "I am interested in politics so that one day I will not have to be interested in politics." - Ayn Rand |