Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 02:55:11
Server time: 21:04:48, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of February 2692

Details

Submitted by[?]: Evangelium Vitae Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2692

Description[?]:

Perhaps a better suited cabinet.

We would like to take this moment to tell the SCSP that we believed the ministries of Technologies and the Environment are both very important to our country, and thought them to be of special interest to the SCSP. It is the job of the ministers to help their ministries flourish, and felt that the SCSP had more than capable hands to help foster growth in these offices, or do you feel differently?

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:42:07, January 06, 2009 CET
FromRadical Socialist Strahtman Party (RSSP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2692
MessageMr Speaker;

While the SCSP strongly believes in those two domains, it does not wish to sit in a cabinet in which the total budget for the departments were less than an *individual coin*, during the previous administration. As stated before unless more money is allocated to these departments we will not support this cabinet proposal.

I yield the floor.

Date16:01:58, January 06, 2009 CET
FromEvangelium Vitae Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2692
MessageEsteemed SCSP;

Perhaps this cabinet proposal may be something that you would wish to confer about with the esteemed seated members of the SCSC.

Date16:36:24, January 06, 2009 CET
FromRadical Socialist Strahtman Party (RSSP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2692
MessageMr Speaker;

Regrettably there are no seated members of the SCSC of which the SCSP could confer the cabinet proposal with, in the event that the bill passes we will gracefully accept our role, and attempt to improve the domains. In the event that the bill doesn't pass, perhaps you could try to win us over with a better position, such as Foreign Affairs or Defence, a domain that recieves money in the legislative budget.

I yield the floor

Date18:43:44, January 06, 2009 CET
FromEvangelium Vitae Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2692
MessageEsteemed SCSP;

As per an agreement of the Coalition, the role of defense is the governed by the SCSC, and the LCR has performed admirably in this ministry.

Date03:02:13, January 07, 2009 CET
FromRadical Socialist Strahtman Party (RSSP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2692
MessageMr Speaker;

The SCSP demands at least 24 Kundrati Dollars be placed into the budget for Environment and Tourism, and we will change our minds on the proposal.

I yield the floor.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 192

no
  

Total Seats: 91

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Characters are considered to be "owned" by the player who first mentioned or created them. In practice, players may share responsibility for role-playing a character, but ultimate authority rests with the owner.

Random quote: "It is the absolute right of the State to supervise the formation of public opinion." - Joseph Goebbels

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 71