Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5483
Next month in: 00:49:36
Server time: 19:10:23, May 14, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Arusu-Bei | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: OGC.61

Details

Submitted by[?]: Order of the Golden Crown

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2693

Description[?]:

For the King

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:15:28, January 08, 2009 CET
FromHessexian Arab Royalists
ToDebating the OGC.61
MessageWhy does the King have an interest in food/beverage labelling, or how would it benefit him?

Date01:54:24, January 09, 2009 CET
FromOrder of the Golden Crown
ToDebating the OGC.61
MessageThe King has an interest in all of the nation's affairs. Actually, I just want to make these sorts of phrases common-place in our legislation-- e.g. "for the King," "long live the King," "For Quanzar and Monarchy" etc. I put very little thought into these visibility bills.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 125

no
   

Total Seats: 219

abstain
   

Total Seats: 255


Random fact: If your "Bills under debate" section is cluttered up with old bills created by inactive parties, report them for deletion on the Bill Clearouts Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363

Random quote: "God creates men, but they choose each other." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 48