We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Pornography Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Telamonese Islamic Unity Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2694
Description[?]:
While most of us are against pornography on a personal level, we feel that many teenagers will view it no matter what the law says and people should be left free to make their own decisions. We don't not want law-abiding, hard-working young people to be arrested just for viewing pornography. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The distribution, purchasing and possession of material depicting pornographic acts.
Old value:: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for adults.
Current: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for adults.
Proposed: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for everyone.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:02:02, January 09, 2009 CET | From | National Union Party | To | Debating the Pornography Act |
Message | Are we serious! We want to allow children to purchase pornography. What about letting them have their innocence and not being subject to pornography at a young age. |
Date | 14:47:18, January 09, 2009 CET | From | Telamon National Party | To | Debating the Pornography Act |
Message | We all know that Muslims like to fuck children, Mohammed showed them its OK to fuck 9 year old girls. |
Date | 19:48:14, January 09, 2009 CET | From | Telamonese Islamic Unity Party | To | Debating the Pornography Act |
Message | Actually, if there was an option to lower the age to buy to say, 16, we would choose that instead. We just don't want to see TEENAGERS get arrested just for viewing porn. Also, Islam doesn't allow underage sex, and Mohammad only "married" the girl because she was an orphan and needed someone to provide for you. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 262 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 239 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "Men are so simple and so much inclined to obey immediate needs that a deceiver will never lack victims for his deceptions." - Niccolo Machiavelli |