Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 00:43:02
Server time: 03:16:57, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Bureaucrat | Mandarin | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Religious Reformation Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Socialists

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2125

Description[?]:

The religious needs in this country are seemingly suppressed by secular law restrictions. We think this unwritten ban on native cannot continue so we push this bill forward.
The idea is simple: the government regulates what is possible, and the nominated religions take care of their own business.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:27:17, October 10, 2005 CET
From Solentian Corporate Communist Party
ToDebating the Religious Reformation Act
MessageWe don't agree with this and believe any religious business is that of the religions themselves, if they are in fact a religion.

Date00:53:04, October 11, 2005 CET
From United Centrists
ToDebating the Religious Reformation Act
MessageThe State should not be involved even the slightest in the appointment of religious ministers or their salaries.

Date04:07:37, October 11, 2005 CET
From National Socialists
ToDebating the Religious Reformation Act
MessageUnfortunately this is not the general people's opinion and a majority would likely encourage the ideology of the NS.

Date07:31:24, October 11, 2005 CET
From Solentian Corporate Communist Party
ToDebating the Religious Reformation Act
MessageHowever, there hasn't been a poll released concerning this...

Date14:41:33, October 11, 2005 CET
From National Socialists
ToDebating the Religious Reformation Act
MessageOur statement is based on the opinions on the main page - as far as these are correct...

Date05:34:46, October 12, 2005 CET
From National Socialists
ToDebating the Religious Reformation Act
MessageSince the debate did not deliver any reactions from the opposition, we will poll them by voting.

Date05:51:07, October 12, 2005 CET
From Patriot Conservative
ToDebating the Religious Reformation Act
MessageWhat are you? A stalinist?

Date13:43:50, October 12, 2005 CET
From National Socialists
ToDebating the Religious Reformation Act
Messageyou'd love us ;-)

Date18:22:18, October 12, 2005 CET
From Solentian Corporate Communist Party
ToDebating the Religious Reformation Act
MessageOur opposition was actually the first statement of debate...

Date19:54:52, October 12, 2005 CET
From National Socialists
ToDebating the Religious Reformation Act
MessageDo you mean you agree with the second article, and not with the first?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
    

Total Seats: 650

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Selucia is Particracy's modern take on Ancient Rome, located on the continent of Majatra.

Random quote: "If a female president can come here and be treated equally, why can't any other woman?" - Jewell C. Stillman, former Lourennais politician (on equal rights in Badara)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 71