We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Life Quality Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Cildanian Nationalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2696
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortion is allowed during the first trimester.
Current: Abortions are only allowed in medical emergencies.
Proposed: Abortions are only allowed in medical emergencies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding child benefit.
Old value:: Child benefit policies are left to local governments.
Current: The state guarantees child benefit to both low-income families and large families.
Proposed: The state guarantees child benefit to large families.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the pension system.
Old value:: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Current: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Proposed: The state offers a voluntary public pension, combined with other voluntary private pensions.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 65
Current: 75
Proposed: 55
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:11:31, January 12, 2009 CET | From |  Cildanian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Life Quality Act |
| Message | Will be leaved for debate and negotiations... |
| Date | 16:05:07, January 13, 2009 CET | From | Centrist Action | To | Debating the Life Quality Act |
| Message | Against all four points. 1: Why 2: We of the Centrist Action Party believe abortion should be legal during the first trimester 3: Retirement: This day in age, with healthier people, you expect that they only work, basically, from age 25-55 (30 years) and then have another 30+ years (55-85+) living off of a pension that is at least partially public funded? Members of Cildania can be productive members for longer, and should be. 4: No comment |
| Date | 16:34:48, January 13, 2009 CET | From | ProgressiveDemocrats (ProgDem) | To | Debating the Life Quality Act |
| Message | bring up the retirement age on a separate bill |
| Date | 09:00:42, January 14, 2009 CET | From | Cildanian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Life Quality Act |
| Message | 1: Because children are obviously future of Cildania and they are also biggest joy and gift in this world, I think that families with many children should be supported . 2:OK, that's clearly a ideological and maybe religious difference and I don't think there should be a lot of arguing on that one. 3.I don't agree that people are healthier, and I think it is better to publicly fund people who worked for Cildania in one way or another than to publicly fund healthcare for god knows how many refugees and illegal aliens who claimed citizenship. 4.Well we just think people should choose, and it will also decrease taxes. @DMMC : yes, I will. Thanks for support. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 60 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 40 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 110 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker). |
| Random quote: "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson |