We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Health Reform Act of 2695
Details
Submitted by[?]: Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2695
Description[?]:
An act to seek reforming the current health scene. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortion policies are established by local governments
Current: Abortion is allowed during the entire course of the pregnancy.
Proposed: Abortions are only allowed in medical emergencies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The right to euthanasia.
Old value:: Euthanasia is illegal but not considered murder.
Current: Euthanasia is allowed with consent from the patient and the treating doctor.
Proposed: Euthanasia is illegal and considered murder.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Health care policy.
Old value:: Health care is private, but the government subsidises the cost of it for all citizens.
Current: There is a public health care system, but private clinics are allowed.
Proposed: There is a public health care system, but private clinics are allowed.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The funding of sports clubs.
Old value:: The government does not fund sports clubs; only private ones are allowed.
Current: The government does not fund sports clubs; only private ones are allowed.
Proposed: The government funds some sports clubs side-by-side with private ones.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:35:54, January 12, 2009 CET | From | Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei | To | Debating the Health Reform Act of 2695 |
Message | The national government needs one clear policy on an issue like abortion. I can understand gambling being left to locals but abortion policy? Too sensitive to have several different provisions. |
Date | 01:24:16, January 13, 2009 CET | From | Wiedervereinigten Nationalisten | To | Debating the Health Reform Act of 2695 |
Message | We would've supported had you not included the ridiculous nationalisations. |
Date | 02:17:12, January 13, 2009 CET | From | Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei | To | Debating the Health Reform Act of 2695 |
Message | There are no nationalization provisions listed here. If you're talking about the sports clubs, it clearly states the government only funds sports clubs, not control it. |
Date | 02:43:33, January 13, 2009 CET | From | Königstreue Sozialdemokrat 社会民主 | To | Debating the Health Reform Act of 2695 |
Message | Government funding of sports clubs is a worthless expense. Private companies can manage them without the government. |
Date | 02:48:02, January 13, 2009 CET | From | Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei | To | Debating the Health Reform Act of 2695 |
Message | I'm not a big fan of leaving everything to private companies however and creating a balance where both private/public funding can exist is about right. If the rest of the Diet can argee on this, perhap we can let local governments decide about this policy? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 0 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 725 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: You can view who's online (i.e. been active the last 10 minutes) at the bottom of the menu (either at the top or the side). |
Random quote: "In politics, you have your word and your friends; go back on either and you're dead." - Morton C. Blackwell |