Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 03:48:17
Server time: 00:11:42, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): ImperialLodamun | Klexi | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Imperial Pact Cabinet II

Details

Submitted by[?]: Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2699

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:53:00, January 20, 2009 CET
From Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei
ToDebating the Imperial Pact Cabinet II
MessageThe last cabinet should have passed before the elections. I want the CLP to address why they choose to abstain on the last cabinet proposal. This is getting beyond stupid.

Date01:44:29, January 21, 2009 CET
From Liberaldemokratische Allianz
ToDebating the Imperial Pact Cabinet II
MessageWe said that we preferred a proportional cabinet. One should not be surprised if another does not back something they have said they had a problem with.

Date02:24:26, January 21, 2009 CET
From Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei
ToDebating the Imperial Pact Cabinet II
MessageOh, I'm not surprised; I'm just very annoyed with your stories. Its either "the HLP have too many seats" or "the HLP shouldn't take these offices" or "the HLP should have one because their the lowest party". You're using this proportional cabinet bull to just make yourself have three offices and keep the HLP down.

Is that why you abstained last time? You thought you may do well and maybe you might be able to get in for three? I don't know what the freaking deal is with parties have two offices each; it always comes back to you, you're the only one who has a problem with this.

Date02:47:21, January 21, 2009 CET
From Liberaldemokratische Allianz
ToDebating the Imperial Pact Cabinet II
MessageThe CLP has always maintained that we would not vote for a cabinet just for the sake of having a cabinet. If Hulstria is to have an All-Party cabinet, then the cabinet should as closely resemble the Diet as possible. If during a cabinet revision period the CLP moves down from 3 seat-eligible and the HH or FAP moves up to 3 seat-eligible then we would still fight for a proportional cabinet.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 451

no
 

Total Seats: 188

abstain
 

Total Seats: 86


Random fact: Cultural Protocols should generally be reflective of RP conducted within the nation and should not significantly alter or modify the ethnic, religious or linguistic composition without considerable and reasonable role-play or other justification.

Random quote: "It is a man's own mind, not his enemy or foe, that lures him to evil ways." - Buddha

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 65