We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Farmers!
Details
Submitted by[?]: Proletariat
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2703
Description[?]:
| Farmers right for a new society! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning farm size.
Old value:: Farm size is not regulated.
Current: Farm size is not regulated.
Proposed: Farms that grow too large are broken up and the land redistributed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:13:04, January 26, 2009 CET | From | Proletariat | To | Debating the Farmers! |
| Message | Restore this law that work good until the other parties decide to beat the small farmers |
| Date | 20:35:51, January 26, 2009 CET | From |  Democratic Party of Dorvik | To | Debating the Farmers! |
| Message | Instead the Proletariat wants to beat those farmers who actually work hard. |
| Date | 00:58:53, January 27, 2009 CET | From | LGC-Freedom Party (UPDD) | To | Debating the Farmers! |
| Message | We greatly appreciate the Democratic Party's sarcasm. The LGC supports the right for people to succeed through good business practices and fail through bad ones. Its not about punishing small farmers; It's about rewarding the smart ones. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 111 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 275 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 39 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end." - John Dalberg-Acton |