We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Exotic Animals Bill 2124
Details
Submitted by[?]: Patriarchal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2129
Description[?]:
| We must ensure that the trade in exotic animals is regulated as most people are unaware of the proper way to keep such creatures in suitable conditions. Those who wish to may do so, but they must apply for a license which is subject to a test to show that they know what they are doing. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of exotic animals.
Old value:: Everyone may keep exotic animals, the trade in exotic animals is unregulated.
Current: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep exotic animals.
Proposed: Everyone may keep exotic animals, but the trade in exotic animals is regulated by the government.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:58:58, October 11, 2005 CET | From |  Erudite Assembly | To | Debating the Exotic Animals Bill 2124 |
| Message | Considering the implications of tigers running down main street, and having alligators attend ones pool parties, the Erudites certainly agree. |
| Date | 20:04:14, October 11, 2005 CET | From | Patriarchal Party | To | Debating the Exotic Animals Bill 2124 |
| Message | This bill isn't really about wild animals like tigers (there's another legislative option for that). It's more aimed at those who want to keep snakes, lizards, parrots and the like. |
| Date | 17:53:17, October 20, 2005 CET | From | Liberal-Conservative Progressive Party | To | Debating the Exotic Animals Bill 2124 |
| Message | Snakes arnt to exotic... whats the use in changin the laws |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 257 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 73 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 170 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: "A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Antonin Scalia |