We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Police reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: ProgressiveDemocrats (ProgDem)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2704
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The weapons used by police forces.
Old value:: Police officers may only carry standard firearms apart from specially trained firearms units.
Current: Police officers carry military-grade equipment.
Proposed: Police officers may only carry non-lethal weapons apart from specially trained firearms units.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:01:05, January 29, 2009 CET | From | Cildanian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Police reform |
Message | Nope. |
Date | 19:07:57, January 29, 2009 CET | From | ProgressiveDemocrats (ProgDem) | To | Debating the Police reform |
Message | and your reason for that is .... |
Date | 06:50:12, January 30, 2009 CET | From | Cildanian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Police reform |
Message | My reason for this is that police should be able to use weapons to defend Cildanians, their property, their own lives from criminals and other menaces to Cildanian society. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 31 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 143 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 36 |
Random fact: Before choosing a nation, you may wish to research it first. For more information on the cultural backgrounds of the nations, please see the Cultural Protocols Index: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6365 |
Random quote: "The reason there are so few female politicians is that it is too much trouble to put makeup on two faces." - Maureen Murphy |