We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Militrary improvements1
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2706
Description[?]:
| We believe that this will help improve the militray |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National service.
Old value:: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve either a term in the military or a lesser paid term of civilian national service, at their option.
Current: There shall be no mandatory military or civilian national service.
Proposed: There shall be no mandatory military or civilian national service.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:54:46, February 02, 2009 CET | From | United Workers | To | Debating the Militrary improvements1 |
| Message | In what way will this improve the military, no one will be joining it? This is actually an oxy-moron, the military is improved by NOT recruting any people? Not true |
| Date | 18:41:48, February 02, 2009 CET | From | TW@ | To | Debating the Militrary improvements1 |
| Message | People who want to will still join. |
| Date | 19:39:50, February 02, 2009 CET | From | Neo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika | To | Debating the Militrary improvements1 |
| Message | The NKCP doesn't understand the TW@ partys reasoning. Why will abolishing all national service improve our military, if you are suggesting that we try and downsize our armed forces so we have a small proffesional army then this is not the right thing to do at this time, such a downsizing is a long and arduous task which should not be undertaken lightly. If this is what you want then you should clearly state this in your bill, if not then you should probably take more time to think about what you aim to acheive from your bills. Also surely the abolishment of national service involving jobs in the civilian sector is a stupid idea, the skills learnt in this area are vital to our nations infrastructure and the loss of this training would not by any stretch of the imagination be a positive thing. |
| Date | 19:46:25, February 02, 2009 CET | From | Christian Democrat Party | To | Debating the Militrary improvements1 |
| Message | You could make an argument based on national service being against human rights etc, but I don't think you can seriously suggest that this will improve our military |
| Date | 19:51:19, February 02, 2009 CET | From | Neo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika | To | Debating the Militrary improvements1 |
| Message | This being military improvements 1 we can't wait to see what military improvements 2 will involve. |
| Date | 16:37:30, February 03, 2009 CET | From | TW@ | To | Debating the Militrary improvements1 |
| Message | yere, what jamie said |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 124 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 329 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 213 |
| Random fact: When forming a cabinet, try to include as few parties as possible, while still obtaining a majority of the seats. |
| Random quote: "We can only protect liberty by making it relevant to the modern world." - Tony Blair |