Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 4501
Next month in: 01:47:21
Server time: 14:12:38, December 16, 2018 CET
Currently online (9): comeradebulganin | DanivonLuze | dannypk2 | Glamatso | Masionette11 | MatthewMinikin | MedwedianPresident | Moderation | René Raimundo | Record: 63 on 23:28:53, August 06, 2007 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Workers' Needs


Submitted by[?]: Communist Party of Kafuristan

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2125


Low-income families and employees absolutely must be protected in some way from corporate exploitations.



These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:08:30, October 12, 2005 CET
FromOld School Liberal Party
ToDebating the Workers' Needs
MessageWe cannot be party to a welfare system so massive even if articles 2 and 3 make sense.

Date19:23:01, October 12, 2005 CET
FromUnion Party
ToDebating the Workers' Needs
MessageI accept it. Good proposals Communist Party of Kafuristan.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe


Vote Seats

Total Seats: 143


Total Seats: 124


Total Seats: 33

Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position.

Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 58