We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Abortion
Details
Submitted by[?]: Leninist (Communist) Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2720
Description[?]:
Abortion will only be legal in medical emergencies. There is no right to kill our future generations, for you making a mistake. There is no reason, whatsoever to kill an unborn fetus, that has done no wrong, unless it harms the mother. Same goes for cases of incest and rape. If you can't afford the child, set it up for adoption.
|
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortion is allowed during the entire course of the pregnancy.
Current: Abortion is allowed during the entire course of the pregnancy.
Proposed: Abortions are only allowed in medical emergencies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:12:37, March 02, 2009 CET |
From | Republican Party (UPDD) | To | Debating the Abortion | Message | The Republican Party is against this resolution. A woman has the right to choose. |
Date | 23:22:47, March 02, 2009 CET |
From | Leninist (Communist) Party | To | Debating the Abortion | Message | Not if she wasn't careful, and had unprotected intercourse. That's her fault, she should deal with the consequences. And plus, how bad could it be? With Communism, everything is affordable, so she wouldn't have to be afraid for the price of anything. |
Date | 23:31:37, March 02, 2009 CET |
From | Leninist (Communist) Party | To | Debating the Abortion | Message | Communism doesn't have to be a complete dictatorship. There will be the Nazis and and the UPSD. |
Date | 23:34:10, March 02, 2009 CET |
From | Republican Party (UPDD) | To | Debating the Abortion | Message | It's funny how you are trying to make a statement, when you don't even have a single Assembly seat. Just a thought. |
Date | 23:44:33, March 02, 2009 CET |
From | Republican Party (UPDD) | To | Debating the Abortion | Message | I understand your party is trying to make a name for itself because it is new, but it seems like you are showing a little disrespect for parties like the Proletariat, Golden, and LGC-Freedom Parties. |
Date | 23:46:10, March 02, 2009 CET |
From | Leninist (Communist) Party | To | Debating the Abortion | Message | And how are we disrespecting those parties? By not agreeing with their views? We can easily say the same. |
Date | 23:47:36, March 02, 2009 CET |
From | Republican Party (UPDD) | To | Debating the Abortion | Message | No you are asking for a Cabinet office, without ever being in an election. |
Date | 23:48:37, March 02, 2009 CET |
From | Republican Party (UPDD) | To | Debating the Abortion | Message | No you are asking for a Cabinet office, without ever being in an election. |
Date | 23:49:30, March 02, 2009 CET |
From | Republican Party (UPDD) | To | Debating the Abortion | Message | No you are asking for a Cabinet office, without ever being in an election. |
Date | 23:50:24, March 02, 2009 CET |
From | Republican Party (UPDD) | To | Debating the Abortion | Message | No you are asking for a Cabinet office, without ever being in an election. |
Date | 23:50:53, March 02, 2009 CET |
From | Leninist (Communist) Party | To | Debating the Abortion | Message | We want a say in our government, is there are problem with that? Because we share most of the same views with the UPSD, and they respect us enough to give us a seat, as new and unpowerful as we are? |
Date | 23:53:56, March 02, 2009 CET |
From | Republican Party (UPDD) | To | Debating the Abortion | Message | I'm not saying you can't have a say, kudos for wanting a say, it's just give the people of Dorvik a chance to get to know what you stand for before asking for major roles in the government. |
Date | 23:55:02, March 02, 2009 CET |
From | Leninist (Communist) Party | To | Debating the Abortion | Message | Hey, I'm showing the people of Dorvik all I'm for by proposing all these bills. |
Date | 15:16:56, March 03, 2009 CET |
From | Proletariat | To | Debating the Abortion | Message | LCP!
We know that leninism is totlitarism, but you talk against nazis! So why your party make the things together with the NSP?
Have a cabinet position in particracy is not the better goal, because only a few ministry got some kind of power....
What is your position about nazis?
Are LCP a left party or a nationalist and fascist party undercover? |
Date | 20:49:05, March 03, 2009 CET |
From | Golden Party (UPDD) | To | Debating the Abortion | Message | OOC: The only parties with actual powers are Foreign Affairs, Head of Government(None in Dorvik), and Finance. Although for finance, anyone can use his options I believe. |
Date | 20:51:49, March 03, 2009 CET |
From | Proletariat | To | Debating the Abortion | Message | ooc: yeah, and just for this we are wondering why people can kill for a seat in the cabinet |
Date | 01:12:58, March 04, 2009 CET |
From | Golden Party (UPDD) | To | Debating the Abortion | Message | OOC: That's why I tried to make that cabinet making strategy because every time someone wants to change it, we go through maybe 50 of these... |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
Vote |
Seats |
yes | Total Seats: 171 |
no | Total Seats: 223 |
abstain | Total Seats: 31 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
Random quote: "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." - John Dalberg-Acton |