We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear power
Details
Submitted by[?]: Selucian Home and Hearth
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2723
Description[?]:
Our nuclear power industry is well-developed, thanks to centuries of subsidies and mandatory dominance. We think it is robust enough to cut it loose and not spend any more money or requirements on it. Since we have highly restrictive pollution standards, that should be enough to discourage coal and other unhealthy power industries from taking over the market. Why should we favor nuclear over other clean power such as wind when those might be cheaper? |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on nuclear power.
Old value:: The government requires most energy to be generated by nuclear power.
Current: The government does not take any position on nuclear power.
Proposed: The government does not take any position on nuclear power.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 750 | |||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation. |
Random quote: "If you cannot convince a fascist, acquaint his head with the pavement." - Leon Trotsky |