We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Pharamaceuticals And Contraception Legalization
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal-Democratic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2722
Description[?]:
| This bill intends to legalize all pharmaceutical drugs and contraception. Such a policy remains consistent with our policy regarding other substances; we currently do not restrict what mind-altering substances our citizens may introduce into their bodies. Seeing as this is the case, our party finds no reason why we cannot allow the public access to clinically tested, medically beneficial substances. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on subsidising contraception.
Old value:: Contraceptives are banned for religious reasons.
Current: The government does not supply free or discounted contraceptives.
Proposed: The government does not supply free or discounted contraceptives.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Pharmaceutical drugs policy.
Old value:: Pharmaceutical drugs are banned for religious reasons.
Current: The government does not subsidise the cost of pharmaceutical drugs at all.
Proposed: The government does not subsidise the cost of pharmaceutical drugs at all.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:22:31, March 04, 2009 CET | From | Socialist Party | To | Debating the Pharamaceuticals And Contraception Legalization |
| Message | Both good proposals, both of which have been proposed by our party before, and both of which have been voted down by the Surprise party which will no doubt vote them down again now. |
| Date | 21:34:30, March 04, 2009 CET | From | Liberal-Democratic Party | To | Debating the Pharamaceuticals And Contraception Legalization |
| Message | Surely our opponents will eventually let reason prevail; there is no sense in allowing the use of recreational drugs while simultaneously denying the public the benefits of beneficial medications. |
| Date | 00:07:36, March 05, 2009 CET | From | Socialist Party | To | Debating the Pharamaceuticals And Contraception Legalization |
| Message | The Surprise Party and reason seldom meet I'm afraid. |
| Date | 01:09:04, March 05, 2009 CET | From | Surprise Party | To | Debating the Pharamaceuticals And Contraception Legalization |
| Message | Reason? In politics? :-D |
| Date | 00:08:47, March 06, 2009 CET | From | Liberal-Democratic Party | To | Debating the Pharamaceuticals And Contraception Legalization |
| Message | We can only hope... :) |
| Date | 06:46:40, March 06, 2009 CET | From | Surprise Party | To | Debating the Pharamaceuticals And Contraception Legalization |
| Message | Well, looks like you won this, but I'll stand by my position. :D |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 360 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 239 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Check out the forum regularly for game news. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "There is a sufficiency in the world for man's need but not for man's greed." - Mahatma Gandhi |