We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: State Monopoly on Prostitution
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Fascisti
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2126
Description[?]:
| This will make the industry safer for prostitutes, ensure they are not exploited, and generate large revenues for the government. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The right for a person to prostitute himself or herself.
Old value:: Prostitution is legal and a recognized profession.
Current: Prostitution is legal and a recognized profession.
Proposed: There is a state monopoly on prostitution.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:03:24, October 14, 2005 CET | From | Anarcho-Capitalist Front | To | Debating the State Monopoly on Prostitution |
| Message | Disagree, prostitutes and their "employers" and customers can defend themselves within the legal system in the same as any other occupation. |
| Date | 21:49:53, October 14, 2005 CET | From | National Libertarian Party | To | Debating the State Monopoly on Prostitution |
| Message | Against. |
| Date | 03:55:59, October 15, 2005 CET | From | Nationalist Party of Gaduridos | To | Debating the State Monopoly on Prostitution |
| Message | The NPG disagrees with this motion. While we feel that vital industry should be nationalised... this doesn't quite count. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 405 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
| Random quote: "Politics: a strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage." - Ambrose Bierce |