We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Sexual Offences Act 2128
Details
Submitted by[?]: Covenanters (IA)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2129
Description[?]:
| An act to remove these deviants and perverts from our society once and for all. The charge shall be heresy and the punishment death by burning (as sodomy most certainly is a crime against humanity). |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning who can proceed with adoption; in case adoption is legal.
Old value:: Everyone may adopt children.
Current: Everyone may adopt children.
Proposed: Only heterosexual couples may adopt children.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Military stance on homosexuality.
Old value:: Open homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military has a "don't ask, don't tell" policy.
Current: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Proposed: Homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military actively seeks to remove homosexuals from it.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on sexual relations.
Old value:: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Current: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Proposed: Heterosexual relationships only are legal for consenting adults.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:07:53, October 14, 2005 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | This time you have gone too far. You want a fight, you now have one. |
| Date | 16:51:59, October 14, 2005 CET | From | Redneck Party | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | You have our full support. |
| Date | 20:15:26, October 14, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | CHEAT chose to break the compromise, and we've seen what the electorate thought of our term of compromise. |
| Date | 20:48:18, October 14, 2005 CET | From | Seosavists Republican party | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | good propose your oppressive bills the electrate will see what you're really like. Because that's what's happend you got a lot of seats because you proposed only bills they want now they know what you're really like you've gone down. |
| Date | 20:49:45, October 14, 2005 CET | From | Seosavists Republican party | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | oh and to CPP and Redneck look at his describtion, you might support the proposals but you can't support that! "The charge shall be heresy and the punishment death by burning (as sodomy most certainly is a crime against humanity)." |
| Date | 22:38:16, October 14, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | Nope. |
| Date | 00:00:53, October 15, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | ESPECAILLY because you 1 want to kill them and 2, you want to BURN them. BURN THEM! Would Jesus burn them? NO! |
| Date | 10:27:32, October 15, 2005 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | DUP, considering I voted AGAINST the "compromise," what makes you think I would agree not to try to replace it with a progressive option. You are under the false impression that somehow you run Luthori, and can demand whatever you want. The people elected the RzP because they realised what you were. If you continue your current policies, and continue to act as if you have a divine mandate, you shall reap the consequences. |
| Date | 14:52:03, October 17, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | Would the CPP and Rednecks vote for this? (I don't need to ask the UCP!) |
| Date | 15:01:10, October 17, 2005 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | The UCP are insane enough to vote for this, but I appeal to the sanity of the CPP and Rednecks, and ask them to oppose this bill. |
| Date | 15:08:46, October 17, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | This bill is state at the debate stage, so CPP and Rednecks can table amendments if they wish. |
| Date | 21:52:48, October 17, 2005 CET | From | Redneck Party | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | We will vote for any bill opposing immoral lifestyles. |
| Date | 04:06:55, October 18, 2005 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | I notice that your waiting until after the next elections to put this bill to vote. Are you worried that you can't get this to pass now, or are you worried that you wouldn't get elected after passing this, and want to use the next three years to rebuild your voter base. |
| Date | 15:15:53, October 18, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | No, I'm waiting until the CPP say whether they want any changes or not. |
| Date | 01:20:51, October 19, 2005 CET | From | United Conservative Party | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | This is a very modest Bill, and quite progressive. It perhaps does not go quite fare enough, but I'll support it nonetheless. You know it makes sense. |
| Date | 06:49:35, October 19, 2005 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | This bill is progressive? That makes no sense! |
| Date | 13:50:40, October 19, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | *pumps shotgun* Viva la revolucion! =D But seriously, BURNING?!? We are not a medieval country, where everyone starts screamin "BURN 'EM!" at every interval possible. If this bill passes, it seems that the separation of Church and State is very much dead. |
| Date | 15:30:21, October 19, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | If the CPP don't agree with burning I will go along with imprisonment, combined with measures to prevent repeat offences. |
| Date | 02:24:54, October 20, 2005 CET | From | United Conservative Party | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | I could forego the burnings ... but I would need to see very substantial gaol terms. And perhaps some kind of permanent DYE (or tattoo) to the forehead of child-moletsers and repeat sexual deviants. The citizens of Lurthori should have the opportunity to identify these deviants before good people fall prey to these monsters' Godless acts. |
| Date | 15:32:59, October 20, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | "because you 1 want to kill them and 2, you want to BURN them." If we were to remove the burning, and replace it with a system of imprisonment, with the possibility of early release if corrective training is successful, would the RzP support this? |
| Date | 16:31:43, October 20, 2005 CET | From | Catholic Peoples Party | To | Debating the Sexual Offences Act 2128 |
| Message | big aye as usual |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 412 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 194 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 144 |
| Random fact: Particracy has been running since 2005. Dorvik was Particracy's first nation, the Dorvik Social Democrats the first party and the International Greens the first Party Organisation. |
| Random quote: "The best political weapon is the weapon of terror. Cruelty commands respect. Men may hate us, but we don't ask for their love, only for their fear." - Heinrich Himmler |