We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Gambling Regulation
Details
Submitted by[?]: Darnussian Nationalist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2725
Description[?]:
To have tighter restrictions on Gambling |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The right to gamble.
Old value:: Gambling is legal across the nation, no regulation whatsoever.
Current: Gambling is legal across the nation, no regulation whatsoever.
Proposed: Gambling is illegal unless taking place in a licensed casino.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:04:17, March 12, 2009 CET | From | Surprise Party | To | Debating the Gambling Regulation |
Message | I likes me my unregulated gambling. |
Date | 23:08:39, March 12, 2009 CET | From | Darnussian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Gambling Regulation |
Message | Ah, you show your true and sinful colours my liberal friend. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 213 | ||
no |
Total Seats: 302 | ||
abstain |
Total Seats: 84 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "Suburbia is where the developer bulldozes out the trees, then names the streets after them." - Bill Vaughn |