Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:15:32
Server time: 20:44:27, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): chrismcsherbert | JourneyKan | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Proposal to Introduce Community Diversity Through Racial Homogenization

Details

Submitted by[?]: Marxist Universalist Democratic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2729

Description[?]:

Currently, there is a large minority population in our great nation. To combat the anomie of being a minority, we propose measures to fund, with taxpayer money, initiatives to encourage interracial relationships.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:21:24, March 21, 2009 CET
FromJudicial Union Party
ToDebating the Proposal to Introduce Community Diversity Through Racial Homogenization
MessageThese are all very distinct, and should be in separate bills. The JUP supports only the change to citizenship, everything else is problematic. For instance, why would we give a child benefit to rich families? That is nothing but a big waste of money.

Date02:28:14, March 22, 2009 CET
FromMarxist Universalist Democratic Party
ToDebating the Proposal to Introduce Community Diversity Through Racial Homogenization
MessageIt's important to give benefit to rich families if the children are of interracial descent.

Date06:20:47, March 22, 2009 CET
FromJudicial Union Party
ToDebating the Proposal to Introduce Community Diversity Through Racial Homogenization
MessageUh... that doesn't make much sense...

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
   

Total Seats: 500

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map.

    Random quote: "The key to understanding the American system is to imagine that you have the power to make nearly any law you want, but your worst enemy will be the one to enforce it." - Rick Cook

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 71