We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: media content act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Alderdath Lebrali Demkratti
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2126
Description[?]:
this law will ban hate speeches |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding regulation of media content.
Old value:: There are laws against the publication of false information; everything else may be published freely.
Current: There are laws against the publication of false information; everything else may be published freely.
Proposed: There are laws against the publication of false information and hate speech.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:28:18, October 15, 2005 CET | From | Unio enim si quis Motus Populi | To | Debating the media content act |
Message | this is why we need a first amendment and/or a general bill of rights in our constitutions. Hate speech, no matter how misguided are asinine, is still free speech, in our view, as long as it does not incite action. I may not agree with what they have to say, but I will defend to the death their right to say it, to quote a famous philosophe. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 30 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 239 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 36 |
Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation. |
Random quote: "Popular suffrage is in itself no guarantee of freedom. People can vote themselves into slavery." - Frank Chodorov |