We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Intelligence Agency Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Front for State Prosperity
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2127
Description[?]:
| We of the PCP see no reason to actively fund and seek to interfere with other nations. The role of the national intelligence agency should be limited to preventing others from interfering with us and providing the government with a minimum of necessary information on other countries. By limitting scope in this way we will save money and increase the effectiveness of the agency. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Nation's policy with regards to an intelligence agency.
Old value:: The nation has an intelligence agency that is permitted by law to undertake all types of covert operations in other countries.
Current: The nation has an intelligence agency that is permitted by law to undertake all types of covert operations in other countries.
Proposed: The nation has an intelligence agency, but it is limited to counter-intelligence and surveillance of other countries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:47:36, October 17, 2005 CET | From | Front for State Prosperity | To | Debating the National Intelligence Agency Reform |
| Message | If anyone objects, they can state why during voting. My position on this wouldn't change anyways. |
| Date | 04:47:42, October 17, 2005 CET | From | Front for State Prosperity | To | Debating the National Intelligence Agency Reform |
| Message | If anyone objects, they can state why during voting. My position on this wouldn't change anyways. |
| Date | 06:35:29, October 17, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Party | To | Debating the National Intelligence Agency Reform |
| Message | While we do support a strong national defense and want to keep all military options on the table, our country does have other issues that are more important. Limiting the scope of the national intelligence agency is a good way to save the government some money. |
| Date | 21:30:41, October 17, 2005 CET | From | AM Radical Libertarian Party | To | Debating the National Intelligence Agency Reform |
| Message | We need to keep open our possibilities, so I cannot support limiting the scope of our intelligence agencies in this fashion. |
| Date | 02:22:26, October 18, 2005 CET | From | Front for State Prosperity | To | Debating the National Intelligence Agency Reform |
| Message | Limitting the scope increases the effectiveness and efficiency - I don't care to destabilize others, as long as others cannot destabilize us. You're a libertarian party. What would you think if these vast extralegal powers were turned against our own citizens? Name me one government in history that was so perfectly moral that the national intelligence agency never looked at national citizens! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 254 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 246 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The Real-Life Equivalents Index is a valuable resource for finding out the in-game equivalents of real-life cultures, languages, religions, people and places: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6731 |
| Random quote: "The 20th century has been characterised by three developments of great political importance: the growth of democracy, the growth of corporate power; and the growth of corporate propaganda against democracy." - Alex Carey |