Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 02:15:10
Server time: 05:44:49, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Regulation of Pollution

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party for Equality

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2044

Description[?]:

Let Likaton set an example to the nations of the world by taking steps to ensure that we protect our piece of it from environmental damage.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Datenot recorded
FromProletariat Revolution Party
ToDebating the Regulation of Pollution
MessageA moderate/centrist approach is truly in the best interest of the people.

Datenot recorded
From
ToDebating the Regulation of Pollution
MessageWe would support this.

Date02:00:10, April 28, 2005 CET
FromNational Centrist Party
ToDebating the Regulation of Pollution
MessageI only hurt our economy.

Date02:02:11, April 28, 2005 CET
FromNational Centrist Party
ToDebating the Regulation of Pollution
MessageAhem! Our typist was fired, THAT won't happen again. The message was intended to be, "I only hope it doesn't hurt our economy."

Date14:50:44, April 28, 2005 CET
From
ToDebating the Regulation of Pollution
Messagelol. Moderate restrictions would only hurt companies who are causing damage to health and the environment - both of which are a cost to the economy.

Date22:25:25, April 28, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Party
ToDebating the Regulation of Pollution
MessageI agree....but I will still try to get local govts to do this.

Date22:55:01, April 28, 2005 CET
From
ToDebating the Regulation of Pollution
MessageAt the risk of boring you all, environmental protection on such a small scale will be ineffective as pollution does not recognise political boundaries.

Date00:52:32, April 29, 2005 CET
FromNational Centrist Party
ToDebating the Regulation of Pollution
MessageModerate restrictions are more than enough. Increasing restrictions beyond what this proposes to do would do nothing more than drive off businesses. We'll support this, but no further.

Date14:58:08, April 29, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Party for Equality
ToDebating the Regulation of Pollution
Messageexactly. this is a compromise. so let us vote.

Date01:22:18, April 30, 2005 CET
From
ToDebating the Regulation of Pollution
MessageUnanimous. We should congratulate ourselves on our ability to find the middle ground!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 167

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain

      Total Seats: 0


      Random fact: Players using inactive accounts and/or accounts from outside nations may only propose bills and/or contribute to discussions, whether IC (in-character) or OOC (out-of-character) with the general consent of the players in the nation.

      Random quote: "Fascism is capitalism plus murder." - Upton Sinclair

      This page was generated with PHP
      Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
      Queries performed: 71