We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Regulation of Pollution
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party for Equality
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2044
Description[?]:
Let Likaton set an example to the nations of the world by taking steps to ensure that we protect our piece of it from environmental damage. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: The government provides pollution prevention guidelines, but does not enforce them.
Current: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Proposed: The government enforces moderate pollution restrictions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | not recorded | From | Proletariat Revolution Party | To | Debating the Regulation of Pollution |
Message | A moderate/centrist approach is truly in the best interest of the people. |
Date | not recorded | From | To | Debating the Regulation of Pollution |
Message | We would support this. |
Date | 02:00:10, April 28, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Regulation of Pollution |
Message | I only hurt our economy. |
Date | 02:02:11, April 28, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Regulation of Pollution |
Message | Ahem! Our typist was fired, THAT won't happen again. The message was intended to be, "I only hope it doesn't hurt our economy." |
Date | 14:50:44, April 28, 2005 CET | From | To | Debating the Regulation of Pollution |
Message | lol. Moderate restrictions would only hurt companies who are causing damage to health and the environment - both of which are a cost to the economy. |
Date | 22:25:25, April 28, 2005 CET | From | People's Party | To | Debating the Regulation of Pollution |
Message | I agree....but I will still try to get local govts to do this. |
Date | 22:55:01, April 28, 2005 CET | From | To | Debating the Regulation of Pollution |
Message | At the risk of boring you all, environmental protection on such a small scale will be ineffective as pollution does not recognise political boundaries. |
Date | 00:52:32, April 29, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Regulation of Pollution |
Message | Moderate restrictions are more than enough. Increasing restrictions beyond what this proposes to do would do nothing more than drive off businesses. We'll support this, but no further. |
Date | 14:58:08, April 29, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party for Equality | To | Debating the Regulation of Pollution |
Message | exactly. this is a compromise. so let us vote. |
Date | 01:22:18, April 30, 2005 CET | From | To | Debating the Regulation of Pollution |
Message | Unanimous. We should congratulate ourselves on our ability to find the middle ground! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 167 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players using inactive accounts and/or accounts from outside nations may only propose bills and/or contribute to discussions, whether IC (in-character) or OOC (out-of-character) with the general consent of the players in the nation. |
Random quote: "Fascism is capitalism plus murder." - Upton Sinclair |