Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5574
Next month in: 02:19:15
Server time: 09:40:44, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Paradigm Economics

Details

Submitted by[?]: H+ Paradigm

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2734

Description[?]:

...

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:43:24, March 30, 2009 CET
From Bøsser og Tosser
ToDebating the Paradigm Economics
MessageArt. 1: ok, acceptable
Art. 2: fullheartedly YES!
Art. 3: ok, as it improves on the current situation. would back stronger improvement.
Art. 4: YES, great improvement.
Art. 5: a reluctant "hmm, 'kay". we would approve nationalized energy production much more if the policy of massive backing for muclear plants was abolished.
Art. 6: neutral, but why would you change that?
Art. 7: yes, would back stronger improvement of workers' rights
Art. 8: yes!
Art. 9: neutral, but, again: why would you change that?
Art. 10: no!
Art. 11 to 14: YEAH!

so it comes to a strong "yes"

Date21:49:52, March 30, 2009 CET
From H+ Paradigm
ToDebating the Paradigm Economics
MessageArt. 1: Yay!
Art. 2: Yay!
Art. 3: Complete ban on child labor?
Art. 4: Yay!
Art. 5: There is nothing wrong with nuclear power.
Art. 6: Fireworks could potentially be used as weapons. Therefore, citizens shouldn't have any.
Art. 7: Not really.
Art. 8: Yay!
Art. 9: To ensure that the only gambling that takes place is gambling the government deems acceptable and that the government gets a cut.
Art. 10: Why not?
Art. 11 to 14: Yay!

Great another party to steal voters from the Paradigm. Bah. *shakes fist and scowls in direction of KKP and BoT.

Date22:57:17, March 30, 2009 CET
From Bøsser og Tosser
ToDebating the Paradigm Economics
Message3: depends on how you define "child". stronger regulations for non-adults aged 14 and older, complete ban for those younger. that would be my idea. but our legislative process seems not flexible enough for such that at the moment.

5: as long as everything runs fine, not accidents occur and you have no waste to store: yes, there's nothing wrong. but the potential of damage in case of an accident or of a terrorist attack in/against a nuclear power plant, the risk of nuclear waste material getting into hands that should not have access to it and the necessity of assuring secure storage of waste for generations are very strong arguments against nuclear power in my opinion.

6: well, kitchen knives could also be used as weapons. but i see your point.

7: well, than that might be a bill to pass with the KKP ;-)

9: hm, i'd see gambling more as something to spend your free time and by illegalizing it, your cutting down people's choices what to do in their sparetime. but again: i see your point.

10: industrial hemp is a drug-free and ecologically highly valuable crop.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 44

no
   

Total Seats: 31

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: The voters enjoy active parties who take upon themselves the initiative to create laws.

Random quote: "The activist is not the man who says the river is dirty. The activist is the man who cleans up the river." - Ross Perot

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 114