We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ending Compulsory Pensions
Details
Submitted by[?]: Freedom Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2127
Description[?]:
We force people to take public pensions and opt in to a private pension. This is an infringement on liberties in our view, people should be able to opt out and decide to opt in to a private pension. The money we save can be spent on reducing taxes |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the pension system.
Old value:: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Current: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Proposed: The state does not operate a pension system. Individuals must save up for retirement on their own.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:27:23, October 16, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Ending Compulsory Pensions |
Message | No comments? |
Date | 14:21:06, October 16, 2005 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Ending Compulsory Pensions |
Message | Forcing people to take pensions? This is the most astounding capitalist bullshit I've seen for some time! The fact remains that poor people have little money to give "voluntarily" to private companies in order to have a pension, therefore that State MUST provide a public pension. |
Date | 14:22:34, October 16, 2005 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Ending Compulsory Pensions |
Message | Forcing people to take pensions? This is the most astounding capitalist bullshit I've seen for some time! The fact remains that poor people have little money to give "voluntarily" to private companies in order to have a pension, therefore that State MUST provide a public pension. |
Date | 14:31:59, October 16, 2005 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Ending Compulsory Pensions |
Message | We also take not of your double-standards: you consider forcing people to get shot for their country not an infringement upon their rights, but you do consider not letting people starve an infringement upon civil rights. :rolleyes: |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 189 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 250 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 160 |
Random fact: It is the collective responsibility of the players in a nation to ensure all currently binding RP laws are clearly outlined in an OOC reference bill in the "Bills under debate" section of the nation page. Confusion should not be created by displaying only some of the current RP laws or displaying RP laws which are no longer current. |
Random quote: "Society comprises two classes: those who have more food than appetite, and those who have more appetite than food." - Nicolas Chamfort |