We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Privitisation and Enterprise Bill 2747
Details
Submitted by[?]: The Kanjoran Centrist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2748
Description[?]:
| Evolving the original act. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may not seize private property.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on industry and subsidies to industrial operations.
Old value:: The government acts as an investor of last resort, by nationalizing failing industries that provide vital goods or services.
Current: Certain industries are owned by the state, all others are under private ownership.
Proposed: The government does not intervene in the market nor provide any form of subsidies/relief to industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:29:54, April 26, 2009 CET | From |  The Kanjoran Centrist Party | To | Debating the Privitisation and Enterprise Bill 2747 |
| Message | We will support coalitions amendement bill if these measures are voted in. |
| Date | 18:50:32, April 26, 2009 CET | From | Union Hosienne-Démocrate (UHD) | To | Debating the Privitisation and Enterprise Bill 2747 |
| Message | This isn't really part of the deal. The deal was that the MRN supported YOUR last privatization bill and in return you compromise with THEM on the Coalition bill. |
| Date | 17:53:34, April 27, 2009 CET | From | The Kanjoran Centrist Party | To | Debating the Privitisation and Enterprise Bill 2747 |
| Message | Yes and we are saying that the amendment measures means the reforms in this bill are necessary. |
| Date | 20:08:17, April 27, 2009 CET | From | Parti Populiste Nationale de Kanjor | To | Debating the Privitisation and Enterprise Bill 2747 |
| Message | The MRN will not be mocked or coerced into compromising anymore of its principles. We have compromised enough; you will not have our vote on this proposal. |
| Date | 20:45:57, April 27, 2009 CET | From | The Kanjoran Centrist Party | To | Debating the Privitisation and Enterprise Bill 2747 |
| Message | We will maintain our end of the compromise agreement and vote for your amendments, in introducing this proposal we merely sought to further roll back state influence in other economic areas. This was not meant to mock the beliefs of the MRN. |
| Date | 22:35:03, April 27, 2009 CET | From | Union Hosienne-Démocrate (UHD) | To | Debating the Privitisation and Enterprise Bill 2747 |
| Message | We cannot agree to these measures; proposal 1 is too extreme. Right now you are blackmailing all coalition members into supporting this bill IN ORDER to SUPPORT the Compromise Bill; which is NOT the AGREED upon DECISION! |
| Date | 22:47:35, April 27, 2009 CET | From | Union Hosienne-Démocrate (UHD) | To | Debating the Privitisation and Enterprise Bill 2747 |
| Message | These measures were not debated, nor agreed upon. |
| Date | 23:36:34, April 27, 2009 CET | From | The Kanjoran Centrist Party | To | Debating the Privitisation and Enterprise Bill 2747 |
| Message | These measures were left open to debate, the stream of bile up the page is the debate you speak of. It is not the fault of the KCP if you will not do what is right for Kanjor. Margaret Stonemason Premier of Kanjor |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 373 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 227 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to make a reasonable effort to be accurate when communicating the rules to other players. Any player who manipulatively misleads another player about the rules will be subject to sanction. |
| Random quote: "Envy is the cause of political division." - Democritus |