Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:39:03
Server time: 19:20:56, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AR Drax | ChevaldelaMer | Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of June 2751

Details

Submitted by[?]: Rutanian Elitist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2752

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:01:49, May 05, 2009 CET
From Rutanian Elitist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2751
MessageWe have made some adjustments proposed by the PSLM. However we must state that the cabinet composition is not always related to parliamentary weight, but also to experience and political cooperation. Nevertheless we increased the competence areas of the PSLM.

Date12:17:08, May 05, 2009 CET
From Rutanian Heritage Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2751
MessageExperience? Are the 'RHP' not experienced?
And what do the 'REP' imply by the term 'political co-operation'? Are they suggesting that, had we compromised our political convictions and simply complied with the liberal establishment, they would have offered us one or more positions in their cabinet?
We still maintain that it is a travesty that the 'RHP' - the most popular party in the nation for several years running - has not been offered a single position in this cabinet, yet the 'REP' is more than willing to offer the far-left 'PSLM' five portfolios, and to even offer one to the politically ambiguous 'SGP'.
It is of concern to us that the 'REP' has found common grounds with the radical left, and we take this cabinet proposal not only as a clear indication of their political re-allignment, but as a deliberate attempt to prevent the 'RHP' from gaining political power of any description due to a contempt for our party. A dissapointment indeed.

Date17:30:40, May 05, 2009 CET
From Rutanian Elitist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2751
MessageThe present issue is not about symathies or contempts. The REP believes that there are so divergent points in the visons of the RHP and the CLCR about how Rutania should be governed that at the present moment it the reconciliation is very difficult. However when the interests of Rutania demands, we will certainly support the initiatives of the RHP.

Date18:19:10, May 05, 2009 CET
From Popular Socialist Liberation Movement
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2751
MessageWe fully satisfied by new cabinet composition and will vote "yes".

Date22:23:09, May 05, 2009 CET
From Rutanian Restoration Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2751
MessageWe support this cabinet proposal. Prime Minister Raymond, Minster Cooper, and Vice-President Brogan look forward to further cooperation with the REP and PSLM.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 219

no
 

Total Seats: 76

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page

Random quote: "How can you govern a country which has 246 varieties of cheese?" Charles De Gaulle, "Les Mots du General

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61