We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ownership of Guns
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democrat Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2044
Description[?]:
| This will help to reduce the amount of gun crimes and accidents. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Ownership of guns by private individuals.
Old value:: Adult individuals are allowed to own and purchase guns freely.
Current: Individuals are allowed to own firearms as long as they do not have a history of dangerous mental illness or a violent criminality.
Proposed: Adult individuals may not own firearms unless professionally required.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:28:35, April 27, 2005 CET | From | To | Debating the Ownership of Guns |
| Message | Agree completely. Peace, mindly as wordly, requires all weapons to be destroyed. |
| Date | 15:16:12, April 27, 2005 CET | From | Benevolent Totalitarian Party - FLF | To | Debating the Ownership of Guns |
| Message | We agree. The police exists to protect the population, and with the kind of all-pervasive police that we support, there is no need for the population to own guns. Furthermore, an armed populace may endanger the Order of the State, with is another reason to ban guns from civilian use. |
| Date | 16:06:32, April 27, 2005 CET | From | Social Democrat Party | To | Debating the Ownership of Guns |
| Message | I will bring it to a vote then. |
| Date | 13:17:14, April 28, 2005 CET | From | Imperial Party | To | Debating the Ownership of Guns |
| Message | Damn, I couldn't get this passed in my nation. I tried ... |
| Date | 14:46:55, April 28, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Ownership of Guns |
| Message | Why is there no licensing restriction? We cant have just any adult aged person carrying guns, especially postal workers! |
| Date | 13:14:09, November 23, 2015 CET | From | Benners Party | To | Debating the Ownership of Guns |
| Message | True that, but if we destroyed guns completely then well... Lets just say some groups would hide their weapons, so it will probably be better if we just make stricter licenses on guns, and while we're at it why don't we add metal detectors to every public building? |
| Date | 13:17:01, November 23, 2015 CET | From | Benners Party | To | Debating the Ownership of Guns |
| Message | The Federal Union Of Gadurious has only two parties, I am one of them so I don't know where we will stand |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 59 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Submitting a bill without any proposals in it will not attract or detract voters. It will not raise your visibility or change your political position. |
| Random quote: "Communism is like prohibition, it's a good idea but it won't work." - Will Rogers |