Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5486
Next month in: 02:29:34
Server time: 09:30:25, May 21, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Education Act.

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Democrat Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2044

Description[?]:

Education is very important and educated individuals are needed for many jobs.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:41:52, April 27, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democrat Party
ToDebating the The Education Act.
MessageI believe education should be compulsory until the age of 18. However, I will compromise on 16 if everyone would prefer.

Date13:33:03, April 27, 2005 CET
From
ToDebating the The Education Act.
MessageEducation must be compulsary. Agree on 18 as well. Home schooling should be band. How will we know that the private teachers teach the true spirit of Hallibutt?

Date14:41:11, April 27, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democrat Party
ToDebating the The Education Act.
MessageI agree that homeschooling is not really the best way to get an education, so am willing to be swayed on this. What does everyone else think?

Date15:23:33, April 27, 2005 CET
FromBenevolent Totalitarian Party - FLF
ToDebating the The Education Act.
MessageHomeschooling should be banned. And we certainly agree with making education compulsory to the age of 18.

Date16:12:27, April 27, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democrat Party
ToDebating the The Education Act.
Messageok I will make the adjustment and bring this to a vote.

Date16:18:55, April 27, 2005 CET
From
ToDebating the The Education Act.
MessageWe'll vote yes to this one as well then. I guess there doesn't do any difference wether it's the first article in this bill or the article from Education Act II is written in the law.

Date14:51:03, April 28, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Progressive Party
ToDebating the The Education Act.
MessageWhat about those that must work at earlier ages to support their families? Plus, having them stay in school til 18 even when they dont want will contribute to overcrowding.

Date16:48:24, April 28, 2005 CET
FromBenevolent Totalitarian Party - FLF
ToDebating the The Education Act.
MessageNo family should ever be allowed to fall into such a desperate situation that it would require a child to work to support it. The State should look after them.

Date17:06:01, April 28, 2005 CET
From
ToDebating the The Education Act.
Messagethe state = Hallibutt

Date10:05:32, April 29, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Progressive Party
ToDebating the The Education Act.
MessageThis party agrees with BTP on that and will do everything we can to make good on that promise. Though 16 is still a better age.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 59

no
 

Total Seats: 0

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

    Random quote: "History is made by angry minorities, not by passive majorities." - Fareed Zakaria

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 68