We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Eminent Domain Compensation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Socialists
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2128
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent domain compensation (if eminent domain is legal).
Old value:: The government does not compensate victims of eminent domain.
Current: A neutral body appointed by the courts determines the compensation, either party may appeal.
Proposed: The government determines compensation for victims of eminent domain; victims can sue if they deem it unfair.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:37:08, October 18, 2005 CET | From |  Solentian Corporate Communist Party | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Compensation Act |
| Message | We can support this, although the UC has a similar piece of legislation... |
| Date | 19:00:27, October 18, 2005 CET | From | United Centrists | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Compensation Act |
| Message | Though I wish the NS would have debated their proposal within the Eminent Domain Compensation Initiative, we can still support this. |
| Date | 19:09:27, October 18, 2005 CET | From | National Socialists | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Compensation Act |
| Message | We have probably overlooked the existing proposal in the list of bills still in debate. We feel it is fairest to let the UC decide - to bring their bill to vote. - to agree this bill proceeds. We would expect the same policy when parties bring forward a bill that was already launched by us. |
| Date | 19:21:44, October 18, 2005 CET | From | United Centrists | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Compensation Act |
| Message | As we have changed our previous Initiative to support this one's proposal, perhaps we can simply bring both bills to vote at the same time. |
| Date | 19:31:02, October 18, 2005 CET | From | National Socialists | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Compensation Act |
| Message | That is a welcome idea. We are happy to conclude the UC's policy is similar to ours. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 700 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
| Random quote: "The streets are safe in Philadelphia, it's only the people who make them unsafe." - Frank Rizzo |