We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Animal Ownership Extension
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Socialists
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2128
Description[?]:
We do not see any problems with people who wish to keep innocuous wild animals as pets. Keeping a snake for example could be allowed, while a lion would be forbidden. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of wild animals as pets.
Old value:: The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned.
Current: The government maintains a list of dangerous wild animals which may not be kept as pets; other wild animals may be kept as pets.
Proposed: The government maintains a list of dangerous wild animals which may not be kept as pets; other wild animals may be kept as pets.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:35:25, October 18, 2005 CET | From | Solentian Corporate Communist Party | To | Debating the Animal Ownership Extension |
Message | We can agree to this. |
Date | 19:04:38, October 18, 2005 CET | From | United Centrists | To | Debating the Animal Ownership Extension |
Message | You have our support. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 700 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law. |
Random quote: "Zardugal. . . very successfully almost managed to implement democracy on a global scale, a millennia ago. With a seat in the Security Council we can do it again." - Phoebe Ĥoniato, former Zardic politician |