Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 03:39:44
Server time: 04:20:15, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Nationalisation Bill (2127)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Deltarian Nationalist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2128

Description[?]:

Nations should control their own infrastructure and aim to abolish private property

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:06:06, October 18, 2005 CET
From Liberal-Progressive Union
ToDebating the Nationalisation Bill (2127)
MessageOuch!

Date17:10:58, October 18, 2005 CET
From Deltarian Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Nationalisation Bill (2127)
MessageLol, trying to get a party stance, i'm a lot more watered down in reality

Date17:56:00, October 18, 2005 CET
From United Blobs
ToDebating the Nationalisation Bill (2127)
MessageJust so you know Articles 3 and 6 (like most constitutional proposals) won't have an effect on your party's stance.

Date18:26:43, October 18, 2005 CET
From National Imperial Hobrazian Front
ToDebating the Nationalisation Bill (2127)
MessageArticlie 3 and 6 are unneccesary, but as this is going to pass I'll support anyways.

Date18:28:45, October 18, 2005 CET
From United Blobs
ToDebating the Nationalisation Bill (2127)
Message"but as this is going to pass" - missed out the word not from there.

Date18:46:37, October 18, 2005 CET
From Capitalizt Party
ToDebating the Nationalisation Bill (2127)
Message*Phew* luckily this cataclysm is NOT gonna pass :P

And what does CSP mean with his words?

Date18:50:49, October 18, 2005 CET
From United Blobs
ToDebating the Nationalisation Bill (2127)
MessageTypo I presume.

Date19:10:15, October 18, 2005 CET
From We Say So! Party
ToDebating the Nationalisation Bill (2127)
MessageNO MORE MASSIVE BILLS!!!
I won't suport some of these articles, but might have considered supporting others. As is I now get to completely ruin my stance as this bill is an abomination!

Date08:40:56, October 19, 2005 CET
From National Imperial Hobrazian Front
ToDebating the Nationalisation Bill (2127)
Message*not pass, excuse the typo.

Date09:46:16, October 19, 2005 CET
From Deltarian Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Nationalisation Bill (2127)
MessageSorry, about the huge bill, i was just using up all my proposals before going home last night. Wont do it again and never realised it could ruin your stances as it was varied.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 193

no
   

Total Seats: 207

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English.

Random quote: "Politics, when it is an art and a service, not an exploitation, is about acting for an ideal through realities." - Charles De Gaulle

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 98