Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 00:14:46
Server time: 03:45:13, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Women's Rights

Details

Submitted by[?]: Anarcho-Capitalist Front

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2128

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:05:05, October 19, 2005 CET
FromNational Democratic Party
ToDebating the Women's Rights
Messageno for article 1 (whats the point of aborting a baby in the sixth or seventh month of pregnancy when it can survive outside the womb? Well unless that it was severly disbled but even in that case...)

Yes for article 2

Date13:07:28, October 19, 2005 CET
FromAnarcho-Capitalist Front
ToDebating the Women's Rights
MessageAsk the mother, its her decision.

Date15:22:05, October 19, 2005 CET
FromNational Fascisti
ToDebating the Women's Rights
MessageThe first and second trimesters are plenty of time for a woman to decide whether or not to abort (and even then, the first is probably enough).

This would be barbaric. Why not just let newborn babies be "aborted"?

Date19:21:58, October 20, 2005 CET
FromAnarcho-Capitalist Front
ToDebating the Women's Rights
MessageWhat's barbaric is this idea that all human life is sacred, no matter the circumstances, and that those who are viable people must suffer the inconvenience of non-people.

Shall we no longer allow the humane society to euthanize stray pets? It is no less "barbaric"?

Date03:29:16, October 21, 2005 CET
FromTotalitarian Party
ToDebating the Women's Rights
MessageHeh, you have convinced me this is not so bad, now. The next time you propose it, you will have my support, unless somebody can come up with an argument better than, "It's evil!".

Date09:32:33, October 21, 2005 CET
FromNational Fascisti
ToDebating the Women's Rights
Message"Why not just let newborn babies be "aborted"?"

A fetus in the third trimester is as much a "non-person" as a newborn baby.



And maybe those "viable people" should stop considering "pulling out" as a viable contraceptive.

It isn't hard to significantly minimise the risk of pregnancy, nor is it hard to decide within the first trimester to abort or not.



Killing unborn babies for the "liberty" of morons. For shame.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
      

Total Seats: 295

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: If you have a question, post it on the forum. Game Moderators and other players will be happy to help you. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "It all came from there." - Lech Walesa (pointing to a TV when a reporter asked him why communism fell)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62