We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Women's Rights
Details
Submitted by[?]: Anarcho-Capitalist Front
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2128
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Current: Abortion is allowed during the entire course of the pregnancy.
Proposed: Abortion is allowed during the entire course of the pregnancy.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 09:05:05, October 19, 2005 CET | From | National Democratic Party | To | Debating the Women's Rights |
Message | no for article 1 (whats the point of aborting a baby in the sixth or seventh month of pregnancy when it can survive outside the womb? Well unless that it was severly disbled but even in that case...) Yes for article 2 |
Date | 13:07:28, October 19, 2005 CET | From | Anarcho-Capitalist Front | To | Debating the Women's Rights |
Message | Ask the mother, its her decision. |
Date | 15:22:05, October 19, 2005 CET | From | National Fascisti | To | Debating the Women's Rights |
Message | The first and second trimesters are plenty of time for a woman to decide whether or not to abort (and even then, the first is probably enough). This would be barbaric. Why not just let newborn babies be "aborted"? |
Date | 19:21:58, October 20, 2005 CET | From | Anarcho-Capitalist Front | To | Debating the Women's Rights |
Message | What's barbaric is this idea that all human life is sacred, no matter the circumstances, and that those who are viable people must suffer the inconvenience of non-people. Shall we no longer allow the humane society to euthanize stray pets? It is no less "barbaric"? |
Date | 03:29:16, October 21, 2005 CET | From | Totalitarian Party | To | Debating the Women's Rights |
Message | Heh, you have convinced me this is not so bad, now. The next time you propose it, you will have my support, unless somebody can come up with an argument better than, "It's evil!". |
Date | 09:32:33, October 21, 2005 CET | From | National Fascisti | To | Debating the Women's Rights |
Message | "Why not just let newborn babies be "aborted"?" A fetus in the third trimester is as much a "non-person" as a newborn baby. And maybe those "viable people" should stop considering "pulling out" as a viable contraceptive. It isn't hard to significantly minimise the risk of pregnancy, nor is it hard to decide within the first trimester to abort or not. Killing unborn babies for the "liberty" of morons. For shame. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 295 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: If you have a question, post it on the forum. Game Moderators and other players will be happy to help you. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: "It all came from there." - Lech Walesa (pointing to a TV when a reporter asked him why communism fell) |