We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Transport Act of 2764
Details
Submitted by[?]: Popular Socialist Liberation Movement
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2766
Description[?]:
This act will encourage Rutanians to sell their wasteful, expensive private cars and instead of this use cheap, environmentally-friendly and comfortable public transport. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning private cars.
Old value:: There are no regulations on the ownership of private cars.
Current: Private cars are allowed, but people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives are provided for cars using environmentally friendly fuels.
Proposed: Private cars are allowed, but people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives are provided for cars using environmentally friendly fuels.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:34:59, May 31, 2009 CET | From | Rutanian Elitist Party | To | Debating the Transport Act of 2764 |
Message | The REP cannot support art. 1, because it is clearly a form of positive discrimination and limits the rights of the citizens. I do not know why the state should be involved in choosing the type of cars bought by the citizens on their money. We do not completely agree with the second article either, but we could support in a different form. Nevertheless we oppose this bill. Eleanor Bozarburg, Vice-President, REP |
Date | 23:33:30, May 31, 2009 CET | From | Rutanian Heritage Party | To | Debating the Transport Act of 2764 |
Message | We cannot support this legislation. Common sense and basic fairness dictates that those who use public transport should pay for it, and those who do not should not. Any deviation from this is wealth redistribution - a process to which we are vehemently opposed. We are fairly indifferent to Article 2, but given our strong opposition to Article 1, we cannot support this legislation. |
Date | 01:31:20, June 03, 2009 CET | From | Popular Socialist Liberation Movement | To | Debating the Transport Act of 2764 |
Message | OK, if REP and RHP are so strongly opposed to article 1, PSLM removed it. |
Date | 06:26:56, June 03, 2009 CET | From | Rutanian Elitist Party | To | Debating the Transport Act of 2764 |
Message | Well, we opposed the article which remained. |
Date | 00:51:31, June 04, 2009 CET | From | Rutanian Heritage Party | To | Debating the Transport Act of 2764 |
Message | After much consideration, we have decided to oppose this legislation. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 101 | ||
no | Total Seats: 204 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: After 3 days (72 hours) your account will be inactivated by Moderation. If you want to be reactivated you can request reactivation located here: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4360 |
Random quote: "To the youth of America, I say, beware of being trivialized by the commercial culture that tempts you daily. I hear you saying often that you're not turned on by politics. The lessons of history are clear and portentous. If you do not turn onto politics, politics will turn on you." - Ralph Nader |