We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: New Terms
Details
Submitted by[?]: Nacia Repuvlican partio de Kobura
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2770
Description[?]:
| Terms are extended. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The length of a legislative and executive term, in months. Should be between 24 and 72.
Old value:: 24
Current: 60
Proposed: 30
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:31:12, June 10, 2009 CET | From |  Revolucia Partio de Koburo | To | Debating the New Terms |
| Message | Oh, now that you have a majority, you want to extend terms. How convienient. |
| Date | 09:53:03, June 10, 2009 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the New Terms |
| Message | can the RPC please stop accusing the Republicans. I am getting tired of hearing the Revolutionary whining. |
| Date | 10:18:02, June 10, 2009 CET | From | Revolucia Partio de Koburo | To | Debating the New Terms |
| Message | I'm tired of seeing you fail to to complete a coherent sentence. The Republican Party is taking advantage of the current situation. If they really believed in longer term limits, then they would have voted for, rather than against them, when PFI made the proposal. So, unless you can disprove my assertion, I'd suggest you quit trying to stifle my criticisms with your feeble attempts. |
| Date | 16:12:29, June 10, 2009 CET | From |  Nacia Repuvlican partio de Kobura | To | Debating the New Terms |
| Message | Wait so now the RPC rejects the same bill they voted yes on just 2 yrs ago? Why no do now they feel that longer terms are not nessasary? |
| Date | 16:17:16, June 10, 2009 CET | From | Nacia Repuvlican partio de Kobura | To | Debating the New Terms |
| Message | sorry the RPC now rejects the same bill they voted yes on just 2 yrs ago? why the change they no longer feel longer terms are not nessary or is it becuase who is now in power? |
| Date | 18:08:54, June 10, 2009 CET | From | Revolucia Partio de Koburo | To | Debating the New Terms |
| Message | We never voted for a 30 month legislative term. So stop lying, and trying to deflect attention from your own opportunism. You said you supported the current term length, and now that you have a majority you change your tune. We want a real increase in the legislative terms, not one borne out of opportunism. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 398 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 80 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 123 |
| Random fact: Real-life quotations may be used in Particracy, but the real-life speaker or author should always be referenced in an OOC (out-of-character) note alongside the quotation. |
| Random quote: "Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it." - George Bernard Shaw |