Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:53:59
Server time: 20:06:00, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Security Amendment Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Ecotopian Party of Kalistan

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2129

Description[?]:

We see no advantage in national identity cards and oppose them on ethical grounds.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:29:44, October 20, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Patriots' League
ToDebating the National Security Amendment Act
MessageAre you opposed to driver's licenses?

Date13:35:19, October 20, 2005 CET
FromEcotopian Party of Kalistan
ToDebating the National Security Amendment Act
MessageThe primary purpose of a driver's license is not to centralise government control and bureaucracy over a person; it is to ensure community safety. A national identity card allows a higher level of intrusion by the Government into personal space.

Date14:08:17, October 20, 2005 CET
FromRepublican Party of Kalistan
ToDebating the National Security Amendment Act
MessageI agree with this bill.

Date16:00:40, October 20, 2005 CET
FromFarmers' Militia
ToDebating the National Security Amendment Act
MessageThey're not carrying them anyway, so what the hell. One less thing the government has to pay for.

OOC; Welcome Ecotopian Party! I'm sure the PPP will be happy to have someone along that agrees with him. If you stay this active, then Kalistan may be one of the few, if not the only nation with a full 8 active parties.

Date00:53:22, October 21, 2005 CET
FromPansexual Peace Party -- FNORD
ToDebating the National Security Amendment Act
MessageO, I am! A potential ally, after my old ones stabbed me in the back...

*CoughfarmersmilitiaCough*

(nothing personal)

Date04:06:29, October 21, 2005 CET
FromFarmers' Militia
ToDebating the National Security Amendment Act
MessageHey, I told you it was temporary, though I do admit it was a particularly mean move to totally abandon it. But that stage of my party died with Frank Dealer... depending on how the coin lands, I could either be a simpering yes-man, or an even bigger bastard. Either way, I need a persona for the party, and a change in power will do that.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 67

no
  

Total Seats: 66

abstain
   

Total Seats: 80


Random fact: In your Message Centre there is a really useful feature which allows you to subscribe to all of the bill debates in your nation. If you use that, then the "Watched Discussions" section will show you every time a new message has been posted on a bill. You can also subscribe to other pages you want to follow, such as your nation message-board, party organisations or bills outside your nation which you are interested in.

Random quote: "Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance." - H. L. Mencken

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 67