We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Security Amendment Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Ecotopian Party of Kalistan
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2129
Description[?]:
We see no advantage in national identity cards and oppose them on ethical grounds. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government-issued identity card policy.
Old value:: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Current: Citizens are not issued with identity cards.
Proposed: Citizens are not issued with identity cards.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:29:44, October 20, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Patriots' League | To | Debating the National Security Amendment Act |
Message | Are you opposed to driver's licenses? |
Date | 13:35:19, October 20, 2005 CET | From | Ecotopian Party of Kalistan | To | Debating the National Security Amendment Act |
Message | The primary purpose of a driver's license is not to centralise government control and bureaucracy over a person; it is to ensure community safety. A national identity card allows a higher level of intrusion by the Government into personal space. |
Date | 14:08:17, October 20, 2005 CET | From | Republican Party of Kalistan | To | Debating the National Security Amendment Act |
Message | I agree with this bill. |
Date | 16:00:40, October 20, 2005 CET | From | Farmers' Militia | To | Debating the National Security Amendment Act |
Message | They're not carrying them anyway, so what the hell. One less thing the government has to pay for. OOC; Welcome Ecotopian Party! I'm sure the PPP will be happy to have someone along that agrees with him. If you stay this active, then Kalistan may be one of the few, if not the only nation with a full 8 active parties. |
Date | 00:53:22, October 21, 2005 CET | From | Pansexual Peace Party -- FNORD | To | Debating the National Security Amendment Act |
Message | O, I am! A potential ally, after my old ones stabbed me in the back... *CoughfarmersmilitiaCough* (nothing personal) |
Date | 04:06:29, October 21, 2005 CET | From | Farmers' Militia | To | Debating the National Security Amendment Act |
Message | Hey, I told you it was temporary, though I do admit it was a particularly mean move to totally abandon it. But that stage of my party died with Frank Dealer... depending on how the coin lands, I could either be a simpering yes-man, or an even bigger bastard. Either way, I need a persona for the party, and a change in power will do that. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 67 | |||
no | Total Seats: 66 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 80 |
Random fact: In your Message Centre there is a really useful feature which allows you to subscribe to all of the bill debates in your nation. If you use that, then the "Watched Discussions" section will show you every time a new message has been posted on a bill. You can also subscribe to other pages you want to follow, such as your nation message-board, party organisations or bills outside your nation which you are interested in. |
Random quote: "Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance." - H. L. Mencken |