We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Endangered animals protection act
Details
Submitted by[?]: New Dawn Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2781
Description[?]:
| A series of proposals which aim to shape Aloria into a nation with more sustainable attitudes towards natural ecosystems and the creatures which inhabit them. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards hunting endangered animals.
Old value:: Local governments decide about this.
Current: Hunting endangered animals is illegal.
Proposed: Hunting endangered animals is illegal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of endangered animals.
Old value:: Local governments decide about this.
Current: Keeping endangered animals, or trading therein, is forbidden.
Proposed: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep endangered animals; all other forms of keeping or trading in endangered animals are forbidden.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of exotic animals.
Old value:: Local governments decide about this.
Current: Keeping exotic animals is forbidden.
Proposed: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep exotic animals.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:00:50, July 03, 2009 CET | From |  National Conservative Party | To | Debating the Endangered animals protection act |
| Message | I agree with articles 1,2, and 3. However I believe local governments would be better suited for handling local hunting and fishing regulations. |
| Date | 10:25:34, July 03, 2009 CET | From | New Dawn Party | To | Debating the Endangered animals protection act |
| Message | We are willing to remove article 4 from the bill, as hunting and fishing legislation is perhaps beyond the scope of the primary aim of this proposal. |
| Date | 16:45:02, July 03, 2009 CET | From | National Conservative Party | To | Debating the Endangered animals protection act |
| Message | Yes, that makes sense. I support |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 198 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 192 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 110 |
| Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
| Random quote: "He who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god." - Aristotle |