We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Union and Worker Autonomy
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kundrati Revolutionary Movement
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2129
Description[?]:
The state has no business meddling in the internal affairs of labor unions, nor in prohibiting spontaneous walkouts to protest work conditions. Laborers have the right to handle their own affairs. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Trade union strike ballots.
Old value:: Trade unions must by law hold a ballot of all members before going on strike, majority approval of those that vote is needed from its members.
Current: Trade unions must by law hold a ballot of all members before going on strike, a majority of all members, regardless of if they vote or not must approve the strike action.
Proposed: Trade unions are not required by law to hold a ballot before striking.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 05:08:30, October 21, 2005 CET | From | Unio enim si quis Motus Populi | To | Debating the Union and Worker Autonomy |
Message | And if a majority of the union does not want to walk out, why are they to suffer at the whims of Union bosses? |
Date | 05:27:42, October 21, 2005 CET | From | Kundrati Revolutionary Movement | To | Debating the Union and Worker Autonomy |
Message | Suffer? What sort of extralegal powers do union bosses have in this country? Free association, my friends. If the people do not like the structure of their unions, let them form new ones. Or retake control of them internally. What business is it of ours? |
Date | 12:45:27, October 21, 2005 CET | From | Alderdath Lebrali Demkratti | To | Debating the Union and Worker Autonomy |
Message | i will not support this |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 123 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 182 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
Random quote: "Even when laws have been written down, they ought not always to remain unaltered." - Aristotle |