We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Constitutional Reform DEBATE
Details
Submitted by[?]: SARP - Fronte Nazionale di Liberazione
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2795
Description[?]:
Argoument to debate: 1. Head of Government a. Head of State also Head of Gov b. Separate offices 2. Who propose Government a. Head of State b. Larger Parties c. Each Party 3. Legislature Term lenght a. 24 as now b. 36 (SAP proposal) c. others 4. Number of seats on the Parlamient |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Structure of the executive branch.
Old value:: The Head of State is also Head of Government.
Current: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Proposed: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The official title of the legislative assembly.
Old value:: National Congress
Current: Assembleia da República Popular (National Assembly)
Proposed: Senate of the Republic
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The official title of subnational entities, also known as regions.
Old value:: State
Current: National Districts
Proposed: Province
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:41:45, July 27, 2009 CET | From | Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform DEBATE |
Message | 1.b. 2.c. 3.a. |
Date | 05:45:09, July 28, 2009 CET | From | Left-Green Union | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform DEBATE |
Message | 1. b 2. c 3. b 4. preferably less than 300, but should be an odd number |
Date | 10:00:03, July 28, 2009 CET | From | SARP - Fronte Nazionale di Liberazione | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform DEBATE |
Message | On our opinion 24 is to few, considering that about the first 6 months are lost on government setting up. which is the advantage of 24 months? |
Date | 02:12:11, July 29, 2009 CET | From | Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform DEBATE |
Message | No, no. The Goverment can perfectly be set up with a new cabinet in only one month. There isn't any reason to extend the legislative terms. |
Date | 09:56:33, July 29, 2009 CET | From | SARP - Fronte Nazionale di Liberazione | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform DEBATE |
Message | Since we are not in agreement with legislature length, the article is erased. |
Date | 11:52:16, July 29, 2009 CET | From | Left-Green Union | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform DEBATE |
Message | Are you sure we can set up a cabinet in one month, that is under 4 hours after the election? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 263 | ||
no |
Total Seats: 237 | ||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed). |
Random quote: "Cruel leaders are replaced only to have new leaders turn cruel." - Ernesto "Che" Guevara |