Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5472
Next month in: 00:18:03
Server time: 23:41:56, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): ADM Drax | albaniansunited | Augustus Zardus | DanivonX | hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Foreign Policy Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Alorian Confederation of Labor

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2795

Description[?]:

The well-off nation of Aloria should help support less fortunate nations. Also immigration needs to be cracked down on to protect jobs

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:46:05, July 29, 2009 CET
FromNational Conservative Party
ToDebating the Foreign Policy Bill
MessageWould the ACL consider removing Article 3, for the security of our people? Other than that the NCP would support the ACL's proposal.

Date04:28:47, July 30, 2009 CET
FromAlorian Confederation of Labor
ToDebating the Foreign Policy Bill
MessageArticle 2 you mean?

Date05:00:15, July 30, 2009 CET
FromNational Conservative Party
ToDebating the Foreign Policy Bill
MessageThe NCP means the article about border control on visitors, it says article 3 on my screen.

Date05:01:14, July 30, 2009 CET
FromAlorian Confederation of Labor
ToDebating the Foreign Policy Bill
MessageOOC: Strange...now its 1 lol but yea i get it

The ACL will immediately repeal this article

Date05:03:36, July 30, 2009 CET
FromNational Conservative Party
ToDebating the Foreign Policy Bill
MessageThe NCP thanks The ACL for negotiating with the NCP for the betterment of the Alorian people.

Date05:12:41, July 30, 2009 CET
FromLiberty Party
ToDebating the Foreign Policy Bill
MessageThe LP cannot support articles 1 and 2 of this bill, for the following reasons:

1) We believe that every foreign national deserves a shot at the Alorian dream. To deny them this privilege, granted to so many of our forefathers, is petty. Plus, they provide cheap labour and are a boon to Aloria's manufacturing sector. As long as they follow Alorian law, the LP believes they're welcome to stay.

2) No sense in having poor people in a rich country subsidizing rich people in a poor country. Aloria should deepen its trade and investment relations and practice even freer commerce with the other countries in order to help them develop. Handing out money only harms their economy and spirit.

Date05:35:21, July 30, 2009 CET
FromAlorian Confederation of Labor
ToDebating the Foreign Policy Bill
MessageThe ACoL puts out this response.

1) While allowing every immigrant would be ideal, it is not pragmatic. Immigrants raise both crime and unemployment, as well as bring down wages for unskilled laborers.

2) While your complaint is valid, this is due to a lack of clearness on the article. Truly the ACoL believes the foreign aid should be spent on investing for industry to help improve the lives of workers in lands abroad.

The ACoL looks foward to the LP's response

Date05:46:59, July 30, 2009 CET
FromLiberty Party
ToDebating the Foreign Policy Bill
Message1) About crime

In the 1980s and 1990s researchers have concluded, or at least have lent support to the conclusion, that immigrants commit proportionately no more than and possibly even fewer crimes than native-born citizens. The General Accounting Office, analyzing FBI records, found that foreign-born individuals accounted for about 19 percent of the total arrests in 1985 in six selected major cities.8 The foreign-born represented 19.6 percent of the aggregate population. While "foreign-born" can mean refer to citizens as well as aliens,9 the study makes an implicit case that immigrant crime is in line with the rest of the country. (http://www.cis.org/articles/2001/crime/toc.html)

About unemployment:

We conduct a pooled cross-section and time-series analysis of the unemployment rates across ten major industries in the U.S. from 1983 to 1994 to assess the effect of NAFTA and immigration. Our results indicate that the output produced by the industry, unemployment benefit coverage, and interest rates are significant determinants of industry unemployment rates, but union presence does not affect industry unemployment. Both Canadian and Mexican immigrants appear to be complements to the U.S. labor force, with Canadian immigrants highly complementary to American labor. Finally, the Chow test provides no evidence that NAFTA has changed the structure of unemployment determination in these industries.(http://www.springerlink.com/content/837333682851h15g/)


2) Yes, I agree. But industry in Aloria is entirely private and unsubsidised. Surely it is enough to allow them to freely invest wherever they like for these flows of capital to end up in poorer countries, especially due to outsourcing. We don't need taxpayer-funded foreign aid.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 182

no
   

Total Seats: 318

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "Changing the way we measure things is vital. So is decompartmentalising society making sure that economics and politics are not divorced from other crucial areas of life." - David Attenborough

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64